Here? I sure hope not! At least not all the time!
All right thinking people know that the black album was their last good one.
Actually , my initial point of view wasnât empiric. I mean: what do I know? Iâm relying on the same information as anyone else and I canât have a beer with the wheather reporter to dig up her exact feelings on the issue and the whole job situation sheâs in. I usually listen to all sides, a habit transmitted by my grandfather who was a righteous lawyer. When a case is not clear, someone has to raise the question whether weâre really sure we donât have the wrong end of the stick. Thatâs usually what I do, for good or for worse.
Hereâs a grey vest:
Hereâs what he handed her:
Can you see the difference?
edited to add: If you watch the actual video, youâll see that she is confused at first, and asks if sheâs being given a sweater because itâs cold in the studio. When told that itâs because of judgemental emails, she looks confused and a little irked, but being professional, keeps her cool while on camera. She was not in on the joke. For some reason, you really want her to be, but she wasnât.
Fixed it for you!
Have you read any of the posts in this thread which explain that women are hurt by this âjokeâ, even the ones who play along?
Do you really know better than everyone on this thread how 51% of the population are affected by both overt and subtle sexism?
THAT IS PROJECTION
jesus tits. What you imagine something means inside someone else IS WHAT YOU IMAGINE, first and foremost.
Not their responsibility, YOUR RESPONSIBILITY.
When you use quotes to quote YOUR OWN IMAGINATION, youâre quoting YOU.
THAT IS PROJECTION.
He thinks this is an issue of âpolitical correctnessâ and takes it at face value without thinking. Obviously whatever rationale he provides himself matters little, the execution is poor.
I donât understand the tone trolling here.
I donât literally think that heâs cackling to myself here with the dunderheaded shtick.
All the âIâm a good guy and smart and thus canât have regressive ideasâ popping into the thread without reading the previous discussions gets tiring.
You use the words free-thinker like Iâve seen others use SJW or liberal all too much.
In other words: youâre no better than those you judge, full of urge to profile yourself by defining an enemy where there was none. You found one, but not in the ideas you pretend to represent, but in your contempt and disdain, the lack of respect you show for anyone who isnât exactly on your line of thoughts. If youâre young, you have a lot to learn. If old, youâre probably quite lonesome.
Soldierâs got his enemy, police have got the state,
Family have home sweet home, SS got red tape.
MPâs got his duty, priest has got his sin,
Everybody finds a hole, to drop somebody in. The Crass
This patronizing garbage is where the âfree thinkerâ comment came from.
And you can toss about any âSJWsâ or âPCâ you want, the issue is your lack of thinking about context, not using mean words or a âdisrespectfulâ tone.
Iâd rather be young or old or lonesome than so incurious and lacking in empathy that Iâd pretend that sexism isnât the root of this shitty âjokeâ.
I care more about your disrespect of women than how you frame your arguments.
This topic is temporarily closed due to a large number of community flags.
This is why you canât have nice things.