That’s the most ridiculous thing I ever hoid
4 Likes
Yous had to be there to even believe it, I kid you not.
1 Like
whatever it is, i’ve been eating it with no ill effects for decades.
3 Likes
They should charge more.
They are offering a mercury-free alternative to tuna.
6 Likes
Especially the claim that the material was not fish. That opens them up to so many liabilities from people who eat fish, but not other meats, for religious or ethical purposes (if the foreign matter is meat) and from people with allergies (if the foreign matter is a plant, or any fairly allergenic material).
3 Likes
and the…erm…tuna butt-serenade.
1 Like
clever.
2 Likes
3 Likes
“The ringworm is neither a ring nor a worm. It is a fungus .”
“The fishstick is neither a fish nor a stick. It is a fungus.”
– Matt Groening
6 Likes
Are you sure?
2 Likes
That’ll turn out to be the damning evidence in the trial: “This has far too little mercury to be real tuna!” *loud gasp from the courtroom; sounds of reporters racing of to courthouse phone booths.
3 Likes
I worked at a Subway in the vicinity of where this lawsuit was filed, twenty-some years ago. I am certain that it is (or was) 100% the same stuff that comes in the can at the store labeled Tuna.
7 Likes
I Can’t Believe It’s Not Tuna ! ®
3 Likes
knocks on wood
yep, so far, so good!
Subway’s chicken being only 50% chicken is a lie:
Subway Franchise Systems of Canada, Inc. v. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Subway’s chicken contains some soy; it is not half soy. I don’t particularly care if the lab came up with the 50% claim or if CBC did: Canada’s public broadcaster should have known better and it is deeply troubling that they would lie like this.
2 Likes
“I say, I say, I say…there’s a tuner in my sandwich”
“That’s no tuner. That’s my wife.”
Boom Boom.
That’s no sandwich, that’s a Subway-stuffed bread-like cake substance.
2 Likes
You also forgot Nitrogen. I mean, it has “nitro” right there in the name! That can’t be healthy! 
3 Likes
Never!
(Waaa, waaa, waaa)
1 Like
