Oh would you look at that. It turns out that the whole idea of there being a “tradition” of not confirming SCOTUS nominees was really just a dumb made-up pretext to avoid confirming the nominees of the opposition.
Sounds like a last-ditch attempt to salvage the Senate majority with a fantasy about being able to keep the court conservative-leaning for four more years. But what if the next vacancy is created by the death of a conservative justice? Now you have a seven-member court with a clear lib/progressive majority. What then, McCain?
If McCain had a lick of sense he’d be urging his fellow senators to confirm Garland ASAP, because they sure won’t be getting anyone more to their liking from Hillary.
and this is why if your local congresscritter or senator is up for reelection, VOTE!!! If they aren’t doing the job, vote them out!
Though I wish we had term limits for these idiots. Thanks to the gerrymandering and other voter fraud that the GOP pulls, these dipshits can be voted in for life.
The Supreme Court is established in Article Three, and the President appointing its judges “by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate” is established in Article Two.
It’s arguably more constitutional than the First or Second Amendments, as it’s in the main text of the Constitution, and not in an Amendment.