33 ingredients if they included cruelty.
That is strangely specific. Do you have hyperthymesia orâmore likelyâdid you suspect you wouldnât live through the night, and so placed an order for a tombstone, but the nuggets didnât kill you and now have this macabre, dated McReminder sitting in your garage? I could see that.
This one doesnât.
Iâd say the garbage man is a little overdue though.
Liked for sheer creative âgrotesqueness.â
I was a bit disappointed to see Imahara in those ads. I understand wanting to make some money, but itâs a bad career move. I think it hurt Imaharaâs âair of credibilityâ, not McDonaldâs.
I get the impression Mr. Pollan likes bland food.
I tried counting the number of ingredients in my chili recipe, but lost count when I started to go into the spices. I just grab whatever sounds good that day and saute my base veggies with it. It can be anywhere from 8-15 spices.
I havenât looked closely at his recommendations, but I wouldnât be surprised if he doesnât include spices under âingredients,â even though they technically are ingredients.
The fact that theyâre not releasing the ingredients worries me. Not for the obvious reasons, but for those who unfortunately rely on McDonaldâs as a safe eating choice for things like peanut and nut allergies (which McDonaldâs is very careful about).
yeah, he appears to be a hoopy frood, but i take his recommendations with a pinch of salt (and a dollop of hot sauce). his overall recommendations i can stand behind though.
Do you keep the hot sauce in your purse (or man-bag)?
~swag~
It looks like the author misread the source article, and itâs the current recipe, not the new one being tested, which has 32 ingredients.
From the source article on Crainâs Chicago Business (http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20160427/NEWS07/160429854/mcdonalds-plans-to-launch-cleaner-chicken-mcnuggets?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=Social):
McDonaldâs declined to provide the full list of ingredients for the overhauled McNuggets. The current recipe listed on the McDonaldâs website contains 32 individual ingredients, a figure that includes the oil in which the product is fried.
And then thereâs true story of the lady who called 911 because they ran out of Chicken McNuggets:
âŚHow does a chicken come from an egg with no iron? Or thiamine, riboflavin, vitamin B, C, ABCDEFGâŚDude, are you serious right now?
How does a baby come out of a human without those things?
left pocket, gotta keep it close
Pffffft. This is the best cleaner-label of all time. Of. All. Time.
http://www.twoglasses.com/images/dr-bronner-peppermint-soap-label.jpg
Wack-a-doo beauty.
But, arenât there some GMOs that are specifically about nutritional content? Iâm thinking of golden rice:
Granted, this isnât what gets people riled up about GMOs.
First of all, there are no vitamins beyond E and K. Second of all, proteins can (and do) contain most physiological iron. Iron is fairly labile and so most biological systems keep it sequestered. Did you seriously expect me to list all of the vitamins and minerals in eggs when itâs all one Google away? Educate yourself. Not my damn job.
I think a reasonable critique of the stuff that goes into food is good.
But I also think that itâs easy to give into fearmongering and platitudes. At its worst, a lot of âfood paranoiaâ reminds me of anti-vaccine rhetoric: âI donât understand what this is but it is definitely causing cancer!â It can be like the modern equivalent of the cave man saying âCooking your food in fire? Thatâs why kids these days have these weak jaws and no appendix!â Thatâs not exactly useful, however rightly suspicious we are of industrialized food that we are alienated from (in the Marxist sense).
Pollanâs advice is a good starting point, but it canât be the last word - if everyone ate like Michael Pollan, weâd have a lot more starvation.
But it is also true that food producers have abused the trust weâve put in them, and McDâs is one of the worst abusers. Reasonable food criticism is very valuable. Reactionary ideology, less so.