What part of “opposing the imperial power” is authoritarian, though? What part of “feed the hungry and welcome the stranger” is authoritarian, exactly?
Is that the only interpretation or a byproduct of a particular interpretation?
Including feeding the hungry and throwing the money changers out of the temple?
But somehow that’s the “wrong” way to interpret it?
It’s almost like the world is complicated and not easy to understand… But that can’t be right?
And where did I ever say that it’s JUST “good” stuff? I am really sick of being purposefully misunderstood here.
Yet many seem to do that. I guess they don’t count since a bunch of bigoted men have put their foot down… /s
Ah, yes, as the enslavers were the ONLY ones using the bible for their cause… I mean not a single person used the bible to endorse the opposite… /s
It’s almost like the people with power used things they knew had power in ways that enhanced their own power… but that can’t be true…
This is a problem of interpretation. I reject letting fascist be the one to dictate ANYTHING. EVER. Fuck them. If that makes me a bad person, then so be it.
And any other framework that they feel supports their views. Like science. Like them using scientific language to reject the variety of gender that actual does exist.
Same for capitalism.
Again read up on eugenics. It was considered a “science” that “proved” the “supremacy” of white people.
No. I reject your efforts to paint @anon29537550 as a bad faith actor here. He’s always very clear on his views and intent.
Which ones? You are aware of just how diverse the various Christian sects are, yeah?
That’s not what I said.
But hey, not categorizing billions of your fellow humans… cool, cool.
I’d suggest that you don’t understand the vast diversity of Christianity, since you’re actively rejecting a large swath of the people you’re discussing.
And we’re assuming that the only real Christians are the ones that the media decide are real, which tend to be right wing, because of how the media works… cool. cool.