People who actually buy maple syrup look at labels. The cheaper corn/maple syrup is already available on shelves,at a substantial discount,
Do farmers play this game?
Yes, what we need is more and cheaper tree-flavored sucrose on the market.
Donât get me wrong, the stuff is good⌠but I canât help thinking the following words:
- insulin resistance
- obesity
- gout
- Wilford Brimley
Blah blah ânanny stateâ blah blah âkeep your damned government hands off my sapâ.
Sure, but I donât see this process of industrial extraction expanding the supply of high quality delicious, delicious maple syrup. Instead I see it flooding the market with cheap watery crap sweetened with HFCD, to the point where most current producers go out of business and eventually watery HFCS crap is all you can get - unless you happen to have a couple of trees in your back yard and tap them yourself. Then, in 50 or 60 years artisan maple syrup will become all the rage, and connoisseurs will spit the names van den Berg and Perkins.
For prior art in this space see: bacon, and beer. Both went through the cycle of somewhat limited yummy food -> watery mass produced artificially fortified crap floods and dominates market -> artisanal renaissance in tiny batch quantities -> better quality generally available
What could possibly go wrong?
[quote=âJonS, post:24, topic:20136â]
Instead I see it flooding the market with cheap watery crap sweetened with HFCD, to the point where most current producers go out of business and eventually watery HFCS crap is all you can get [/quote]
that is quite a scenario. How many villains working against you would be required, do you think?
OK. Hereâs essentially whatâs available at one of the local grocery stores. Your flag makes me think that perhaps you arenât familiar with the US market.
Pure Maple Syrup
12.5 fl. oz. US Grade A Dark amber. Remember, your satisfaction is always guaranteed with Wegmans brand products - Danny Wegman. Product of USA & Canada.
Ingredients
Pure Maple Syrup.
12 fl. oz.
Gluten free. Lactose free. Vegan. Made with 2% real maple syrup. We guarantee it! - The Wegmans Family.
Ingredients
High Fructose Corn Syrup, Corn Syrup, Water, Maple Syrup, Contains Less than 2% of Cellulose Gum, Natural and Artificial Flavors, Potassium Sorbate and Sorbic Acid as Preservatives, Caramel Color.
One interests me. The other, despite the discount, does not. And yet, Maple Syrup is a common ingredient.
Personally, I will only buy âfree rangeâ maple syrup. Trees deserve a decent life too!
I see syrup-producing maple trees all the time, but thatâs because I live in a rural area that produces maple syrup. Thereâs not exactly a lack of public trails in the area.
I feel the need to cite some basic chemistry. Plants use Sunlight and bleh! tasting chemicals to create sometimes delightfully tasting chemicals like sucrose. If you eliminate the plants ability to collect solar energy by chopping of all its leaves, I would venture a guess that you might compromise the taste a bit.
Good point.
None whatsoever. Just Smithâs âinvisible hand.â Itâs not that far fetched, either. In addition to beer and bacon, look at whatâs happened to apples and tomatoes.
Sap for maple syrup is drawn late winter/early spring before the trees leaf out.
Are you also offended by this wasted landscape of high-yield wheat?
Youâre a few thousand years too late to be upset about agriculture.
Sure. We have - broadly - the same kinds of options here, and I make the same choice as you. Yet, someone is buying the Pancake Syrup, otherwise it wouldnât be on the market. And in other, similar, markets the low cost/low quality products often drive out the higher cost/higher quality ones.
The last time I gazed out upon a grove of maple trees was ⌠hmm, let me see if I can remember. Oh yeah, it was this morning.
Iâve also walked public trails through maple groves used (in season) for sap collection. Itâs not one or the other.
Also, I donât care much if maple syrup stays expensive, if this experimental process turns out to be unsustainable or otherwise has negative effects that outweigh possible profits. Itâs not like people are dying from starvation if thereâs a maple syrup shortage.
Iâm not sure youâre getting what theyâre doing:
- Grow sapling for 1-2 years
- Cut off head, suck out syrup
- Goto 1
And it took them this long to figure that out?
So the question is, after theyâve chopped the top off the tree and used it like a straw to suck up water from the ground, is the resultant syrup still going to be called 100% Maple Syrup?
Or after the sap that was in the tree is retrieved, the rest of the stuff pulled out is more like dirty water, and they end up adding sweetner to it, do they still get to call it Maple Syrup.
Thats the question.
And in other, similar, markets the low cost/low quality products often drive out the higher cost/higher quality ones.
But they havenât here. And I donât understand why the ability to produce the essential ingredient (âpure maple syrupâ) more cheaply will drive containers of âpure maple syrupâ off the market. Are a substantial portion of maple syrup consumers turned off by the paltriness of âtwo percentâ or âfive percentâ? Would they consider a â50/50â mix of HFCS and maple? I doubt it.