New York Times feature about butts


#1

[Permalink]


#2

Just trying to join the trend on Twitter.


#3

#4

Kardashian’s butt leaves me icy indifferent


#5

insert pic of movie theater marquee from Idiocracy


#6

Apparently Americans like big butts, but for many years have been able to lie about it. . .


#7

Police are merely caught up in the zeitgeist…
WATCH: authorities obsessed with inspecting people’s anuses - Boing Boing


#8

It feels sad knowing that the woman featured is apparently world famous only for her butt-selfies. To be well known because of your attractive anatomy; OTOH Arnie rocked that one note flute all the way to the Ca. governors office.


#9

The NYT is always like 5 years behind the curve (so to speak). Butts are nice n’ all, but the cool thing now is sexy necks.


#10


#11

It isn’t all about superficiality… They have practical applications as well:


Perhaps in the future we will all have prehensile cheeks.


#12

Christ, what an ass.


#13

did someone call?


#14

OK, this seems as good a time and place to ask as any. What does one wear under leggings (or does one)?

Is it any of my business? Certainly not. Why do I want to know? Because I yam what I yam.


#15

Daedalus said “sexy,” not “reptile.”


#16

Judging by the VPL I’ve seen around this university town, whatever damned Grannypants you got laying around. I will not wear leggings, but if I did, I would wear undergarments that eliminate VPL.

(VPL = Visible Panty Line)


#17

Not speaking for anyone besides myself, but I wear my regular underwear, some might call them granny panties. Of course, I’m old (or perhaps modest) enough that I don’t wear leggings out of my house unless my top goes down to mid-thigh. I’m neither a fan of visible panty lines nor thongs, though I would suppose one could go commando if wanting to draw all possible attention to the ass region.


#18

I’m near a university, and these trousers (with Uggs or similar) seem to be common winter wear. (I’m assuming they’re called “leggings” – maybe they are some sort of ski pants.) But no VPLs in sight, which led me to the question.


#19

Consider yourself fortunate. Based on opacity, some variations of ‘leggings’ would better be described as ‘tights’, yet no skirt is evident. To bluntly answer your question: thong or commando would be possible correct answers.

[ed] @cleveremi: based on past comments made by my SO, the best way to avoid unwanted attention to your behind when wearing leggings is to wear a thong or go commando. Unless your leggings are on the opaque side, in which case, get your partially exposed butt home ASAP, and put the rest of your outfit on.


#20

I think you mean translucent or sheer, not opaque.