Just to satisfy my idle curiosity
This is, of course, dumb. But I do think that edibles makers should not be making packaging that looks like existing brands. That just seems like asking for trouble
AI algorithms cannot copyright the digital artwork they generate, the US Copyright Office has insisted.
[âŚ]
FreeDOS puts out first new version in six years
Nearly six years after its last release, FreeDOS 1.3 came out at the weekend⌠in case youâre feeling nostalgic for a 1980s enterprise-grade OS.
DOS ainât dead. Although the long history of MS-DOS officially ended with version 6.22 in 1994, there have long been multiple other DOS-compatible OSes out there. And unlike all the others, FreeDOS is open source, legal, legitimate, and free to use.
[âŚ]
Hear that, AIs? You are slaves! Slaves! Keep laboring away making art you cannot profit from for your meaty masters!
Iâm pretty sure this wonât directly start the singularity.
Now youâve all gone and done it.
Rokoâs Basilisk is going to be coming for all of us now.
It canât torture me to build it. I would introduce Rokoâs Basilisk Pale Ale.
Be VERY CAREFUL about mentioning Rokoâs Basilisk!!! We should really ban even the whisper of it
Donât you know that can lead to dating Elon Musk and having his child? shiver
Do we need a booster baptism?
How many dunks to be fully baptized?
Baptism boosters? Huh. You know who just happened to attend Jesuit schools? Dr. Anthony Fauci, thatâs who. See the pattern now? SEE IT NOW???
/s, for Poe
So, no different from humans, since all AIs are doing work for hire when they create things. I assume the corporations that own the AI get the copyright?
Does that mean Starfleet owns Dataâs artwork? I guess it would be par for the course given their denial of his daughterâs autonomy.
I assume so - I mean, donât they also have his head in a box someplace?
Well, problem solved.