Damnit, stop being logical!!
(But in the future, breitbart and the daily mail have the integrity of an old, wet, angry paper bag)
Yāall better find a dumpster to hide in STAT.
1 Like
I distrusted the latter, so in the first iteration I used the former after a brief check. Apparently the check was not thorough enough. The lady in question, despite her apparent importance, does not seem to have a wikipedia page so cannot use my default go-to source.
Youāve gotta be kidding, right? You know Daily Mail is just as bad, and has a long history of outright making shit up to support bigots, right?
Do you have any news stories that are trustworthy?
Oh wait, you donāt need any - because youāve outright defended the idea that women scientists canāt be collaborated with because theyāre over emotional and canāt be trusted. Youāre COOL with that viewpoint. You see nothing wrong with it, just like you see nothing wrong with brownface, or sexually abusing children.
Somehow you know ALL about all the awful āoutrage economyā bullshit, and can name so many cases, but have no words to spare for the āoutrage economyā of brietbart, that spends a large chunk of its time talking about how black people deserve to be murdered.
Because thatās not āoutrageā, thatās just, you know, news aggregation.
Aggregating news calling for genocide. Aināt nothing wrong with that!
1 Like
shaddack has been left to trolley for too long, being blatantly misogynistic and racist repeatedly, constantly trying to attack people for daring to, you know, talk about racism or sexism.
The fact that he hasnāt been nuked by the mods is shameful, and the fact that heās linking to white supremacist websites that have openly tried to ruin peoples lives while talking about the eeeeevil over-emotional women are trying to ruin peopleās careers is ridiculous.
2 Likes
Thereās a reason why you canāt have nice things.
3 Likes
