it’s a plot to ensure that everyone’s properly churched.
There are no atheists in foxholes
3 Likes
I think you’re misreading that quote.
From the full article that Popehat posted, it seems to be warning that you have to defend the free speech of even the slimy douchebags, because if someone wants to restrict free speech, they’ll start with the unpopular speech first.
So, no, we’re not cool with what Gawker did. We’re also not cool with a billionaire using the legal system to take down a “news” website for reporting something that was true, no matter how slimy they were for reporting it.
13 Likes
This. This, this, this. This.
[Because I don’t have 
to give right now, ‘grumble mumble’.]
13 Likes
Nope.
All of the aforementioned are prime examples of douche-baggery, in their own individual ways;
Thiel and Hogan are terrible people, and Gawker is a terrible company.
3 Likes
Shouldn’t it be “How much douche could a douchebag bag?”
2 Likes
Is there a set standard for tongue twisters?
1 Like
The standard woodchuck sentence makes sense. That sentence doesn’t.
1 Like
Okay… I didn’t design the meme; I just posted it.
Would you like me to delete it, since I can’t ‘undesign’ it?
1 Like
Why would I want you to delete it? It’s just a meme.
1 Like
Then why complain?
How am I supposed to grow my pedant tree unless I water it?
6 Likes
Insert douchebag response here:
Sounds like a personal problem, bro.
4 Likes
Shouldn’t that be a “pedantry tree”?
3 Likes
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
