Dismissive and patronizing.
Chav
You seem to have a specific “type” in mind, but your device is indiscriminate.
ASBO
Are you an editor for the Daily Mail?
False
High frequency sound has different diffraction properties from lower frequency sounds.
Suspect does not equal true.
Citation please.
So your daughter, who is in the targeted age range, could visit the place undisturbed while the device was in operation, but the “shit faced chavs” couldn’t endure it?
I need a little elaboration to understand this inconsistency.
It’s exactly scaremongering. To wit: Think of the children!
So again, as the example of your (then 14 year old) daughter above: How is it that the good kids aren’t bothered by the device in operation, but the chavs are?
Please define “good old-fashioned discipline.” Would this involve a specified number of strokes with a cane delivered to bare buttocks?
It’s good to know, at the least, that you regard disagreeing with the concept in principle as a genuine complaint; it is exactly the principle of the thing that is problematic.
Based on the behavior of a small subset of the youth population, you responded by inventing a device which causes area denial to an entire demographic. And then, with fear as your primary marketing tool, you’re selling these things at £500 each.