Fiddlingfrog!
iddlingfrog!F
ddlingfrog!Fi
dlingfrog!Fid
lingfrog!Fidd
ingfrog!Fiddl
ngfrog!Fiddli
gfrog!Fiddlin
frog!Fiddling
rog!Fiddlingf
og!Fiddlingfr
g!Fiddlingfro
!Fiddlingfrog
Fiddlingfrog!
dlingfrogFid
Does it count as breaking it if it never worked to begin with?
I count making it shorter as an improvement.
That is flipping hilarious.
Congarats to @Melizmatic, the only person to come through my BS experiment unscathed!
Just so you know, I do basilisk walking as a side gig if you ever need it.
i find solace in my post described as a “strange turn.” that not only summarizes my goal in life but makes me wonder where @flossaluzitarin is. however, @anon87143080 is weirding it up enough to make nonsense posts irrelevant
could i get a job summarizing bbs threads? what’s the going rate? not to brag, but i’m cheap
That’s perfectly normal.
User jimmyjangles expressed frustration at some new features. User ishkabibble concurred, stating that so-called “AI” was the result of brain worms in the tech community. A new poster, flammagella, didn’t see what all the fuss was about. The discussions expanded to include other tech fads, including wikis, blockchain, NFTs, and a hot ham sandwich. The thread summary declared the conversation over, while the conversant meatbags collectively shrugged.
(post deleted by author)
fiddlingfrog adds humor to the discussion with a creative and amusing post, and Melizmatic prevails as the only user unscathed in a playful competition.
It just gets more and more absurd.
What a bunch of trash technology.
… the longer the thread gets, the harder it is to trick the robot into talking about any particular thing
No surprise there, she always does that!
I apologize for my previous digressions. Here is a list of other highly relevant threads. I hope the thread summary includes a paragraph explaining how each is relevant to this thread.
ETA: I didn’t mean to link specific posts, just threads. It didn’t occur to me that my latest read would be embedded in the URL
It’s more and more like a fourth-grader’s book report.
i might take multiple machines or multiple accounts to see but i wonder if the llm even produces the same result for the same set of posts consistently…