Did you forget that this is the questions thread?
What are you talking about?
The boy sells those apples, so I have to ask, WHAT DOES HE DO WITH THE PRINCESS?
I thought mustaches were the new mouth fedoras?
That makes no sense, does everyone else on the highway that watches a speeder go by get a ticket too? Why is my lack of enforcement worthy of punishment?
Shouldn’t the analogy be more like the purchasers of stolen goods? And weren’t you even aware of the illegal nature of the posts? Yet you decided to encourage this sort of anti-thread behavior anyway?
Wasn’t my hope that he’d learn from her not to be such a complete tool? Isn’t that book delightfully subversive without that, though?
Shouldn’t anyone proposing Donalding people for innocently liking something be Donalded, really?
Why should others suffer for my sins?
Oh, I’m sorry, you mean they didn’t know there were no question marks in that post?
Is there anything I can do to make this right? Or am I forsaken forever?
Aren’t I with @Othermichael on this? Isn’t posting a non-question almost a guaranty I won’t like it? (Haven’t I always been a grumpy old man?)
Wasn’t that the soul patch, not mustache?
Aren’t you forgiven, but your enablers on a watchlist?
Is this a watchlist that preserves due process? Or is it a suspicion-is-all-we-need sort of jam?
WHAT ON EARTH COULD POSSIBLY BE WRONG WITH A SOUL PATCH OR ANYBODY WHO MIGHT HAVE HAD A SOUL PATCH AT SOME POINT OF TIME IN THE REMOTE AND UNDOCUMENTED PAST?!?!?!?
(source)
Have we come here to discuss morals? Liking someone’s behavior is suddenly the same as trafficking? What kind of non-gray binary world do you live in?
Is liking the same as encouraging, or can it be appreciation at humor or another form of applause? And is applause always encouragement?