I have to wonder about the product development meetings for this.
“Well, I’m afraid it doesn’t look anything like it’s supposed to. We can stamp out the peanut mixture into bat shapes just fine, but it simply turns into a blob when we add the chocolate. I guess we’ll give it up.”
“No, we’ll make them. Just put lots of pictures on the package of what they’re supposed to look like, and customers can pretend.”
4 Likes
Just for fun, hit this link https://www.amazon.ca/s?k=reeses (or https://www.amazon.com/s?k=reeses for the Yanks)
and prepare to go down a rabbit hole of trademark/copyright confusion , almost as bewildering as the Popeye/Popeyes/Popeye’s debacle.
I cannot tell if Reese/Reeses/Reece’s/Reeces is all owned by the same company or if it was pure chance all these entities just happened to dial into the same font and colour combo.
You’d think Bruce Wayne would be able to afford a better chocolatier.
7 Likes
Frankly all of this is irrelevant!
The important information is the chocolate to peanut goo ratio. Obviously the more chocolate the better.
Reese’s hearts are the clear winner.
1 Like
If the “bats” are anything to go by, I betcha can’t even tell which ventricle is which.
1 Like
Holding out for the Sugar-Free version… which would be very appropriate because 2020 is nothing short of bat-sh1t.
4 Likes
5 Likes
4 Likes
Yep. That stuff’s addictive. I’ll still eat those bat-turds.
1 Like
Fabulous bat!
3 Likes
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
