“Abolishes slavery except as punishment for crimes.” Make teen girls slaves as punishment, the rest kinda writes itself, doesn’t it? I wish I was being sarcastic, but I suspect there are MAGAt guys out there who are already formulating this legislation.
Authoritarians are authoritarians are authoritarians, when they come for you the ideology doesn’t matter anymore.
You’ll notice that they’re not focusing their attention on women old enough to have finished their education and gotten a taste of making their own money at a job. No, it is specifically the girls who are too young to LEGALLY be able to do much of anything….if you tie them down now, you’ve got a breeder for life who will find it nearly impossible to dig themselves out of that hole you’ve put them in. Which somehow was a bad thing when they were afraid it was POC having the babies. Wonder what the difference is?
I have a question about the image used for this. Is the woman audience left in the picture black? I mean, it’s bad enough there are any women in this picture at all, let alone three, but …?
I wish I could just automatically dismiss that interpretation because I still thought no one would work against their own safety like that, but I’ve seen far too many members of Surely The Leopards Won’t Eat My Face If I Cooperate party lately.
I lack decent words to express my outrage.
This basically says certain women are now the states" property.
This is beyond obscene.
This is exactly correct, and sums up volumes of their posturing in very few words. Vote blue up and down the ballot. Even if it won’t matter to you, it will to your daughters, wives and loved ones. Or do it just because women you don’t even know will not be tortured and murdered.
I doubt that’s the case.
Oh it matters very much to me.
Ther insanity will be the death of our Republic if it is not stopped.
I do seriously hope it’s not, but leopard faces and all that. It may just be a not particularly high quality photo or a trick of development.
They are claiming property rights, IOW… and that Property is a Natural Resource to be used and exploited just like any other resource.
The Republican Party used to be against that sort of thing.
That’s not ‘icky’, that’s psychopathic!
How the flaming fuck could ANYONE consider this to be anything resembling ‘normal’?
Or at least they pretended to be against it. The point at which they fully succumbed to the Libertarians and started selling themselves as “the party of small government” was the same point that they started pandering to Xtianists.
I suspect the reference is to the 1860’s rather than the 1960’s.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.