Or “My constituents are on to me and I can’t rake in the bribes and kick backs in congress anymore.”
Objection, assumes facts not in evidence.
I’m willing to believe it, but I wish they told us whose reputation she built. It’s nice she did someone that favor, though. She wasn’t nearly so nice to the rest of us.
Not sure I’m a fan of that, since it just reinforces the whole concept of bi-sexuality not actually existing… And yes, I understand that reductress is a satire site… but still.
I’m bi- and trans- sexual. I’ve been told for 30+ years that I’m delusional and don’t really exist. This headline struck me as using humor to fight back, if only a little. But if it reads as me endorsing or reinforcing the basis of those attacks, I’m happy to delete it.
Sinema is weird.
She could have just been a moderate Democrat w. some progressive sheen; or she might have actually attempted to be a bipartisan dealmaker; and she’d likely be re-elected easily and have a solid Senate career ahead of her. But she threw it all away by behaving in frankly childish ways.
I guess her disastrous, unpopular and unsuccessful “maverick” act wasn’t an act, but a genuine expression of her beliefs and personality.
Okay… cool, but it just didn’t land for me.
Oh, not at all. If you find it funny, great, I just personally didn’t.
I think she’s just a grifter.
TBF, these are not mutually exclusive. This former may be debatable, the latter is not.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.