Not sure whether to be impressed at the wit or depressed at the reminder.
19 Likes
18 Likes
If you stand five feet to the left of a Republican, you too can get a drink from the money hose.
16 Likes
Pretty tricky trying to stand to the right of them.
edited for a bit less sweary.
12 Likes
Hmm, not really, I suppose. I’m way over there on the left.
11 Likes
Way left here also. Just saying there’s not much room to the right of them. 
8 Likes
8 Likes
16 Likes
‘Liked’ for the tune anyway. 
6 Likes
He’s going to end up sleeping in his Bentley down by the river.
17 Likes
16 Likes
Harsh realm dude.
10 Likes
He’ll be knighting the squeegee guy for services to the windscreen.
10 Likes
Absolutely no mention of a racial element in the people he smeared, but as a “constitutional sheriff”, any moment now, because that train is never late.
16 Likes
In other news, accused sex trafficker and flight risk still able to send regular emails to his literal fan club.
13 Likes
An email apparently sent by Andrew Tate from jail in Romania has described his living conditions in his cell as dark and infested with cockroaches, lice, and bed bugs.
So, anyway, it’s supposed to be a bit below freezing here the next few days, and I just planted lettuce.
13 Likes
The judge shredded a shopping list of defence excuses, “define Nazi”, “Ironic Nazi”, “Originally Nazis…”
In his 72-page decision, Quebec court Judge Del Negro rejected the argument that Sohier-Chaput’s writing was intended to be humorous, not hateful, and pointed out the defence didn’t use any previously established defences against a hate-speech charge.
“After analyzing the defence, the court wholly rejects all of his explanations,” he said. “[Sohier-Chaput] strategically spread these messages to couch hateful ideology.”
“There is nothing ironic in the fact that millions of Jewish people and others were exterminated during the Holocaust orchestrated by the Nazis … it is one of the saddest events in the history of humanity.”
Del Negro also dismissed the argument put forward by Sohier-Chaput’s lawyer that “genocide wasn’t originally central to Nazism” and that the Crown needed to bring evidence forward to prove Nazis saw Jewish people as inferior.
“The defence submitted no proof, no historical evidence, no expert voice to push back against the accepted facts,” Del Negro said. “It wanted to distort the facts.”
The judge called this argument “a waste of judicial resources.”
15 Likes
Dunno, is your cellmate available for interviews?
8 Likes
He’ll have to shave downstairs to match his head.
Hey - here’s a dirty, bent, rusty razor for you!
8 Likes
