wish it was real, but the give away - shakey cam. Clandestine compromat is collected by hidden planted cameras which are stationary.
If there’s no real footage at all, fake videos like this one still tie into the regime’s larger narrative that everything can be faked, therefore every accusation against them is a fake one.
“filming a handheld video of another video playing on a screen absolutely destroys the quality, and is exactly the kind of thing you’d do to intentionally obscure detail and sell a fake.”
But if you are surreptitiously trying to film something you aren’t supposed to be filming, that’s exactly what you would do.
Anyway, I basically agree with his assessment: it’s fake, and maybe was done to neutralize the effects of a real pee tape should it ever appear; whoever made this tape thinks there is a real tape and spent a good deal of money to try and protect against it.
is one of the girls a look a like for Ivanka? pretty sure that’ll be a marker for authenticity.
What makes it seem fake to me is that “Trump” is just sitting there. I can’t imagine a hyperactive dom like him wouldn’t be bouncing all over the place in that situation (probably while choking his chicken, or having someone else do it).
It might rattle Trump if someone made a fake that is otherwise a perfect copy of real events, showing that they probably had access to a real tape.
Pretty expensive trolling however. Mailing him a thumb drive with snippets from the real one would work just as well.
Eh, if the other side chooses that climate change isn´t real, I choose that this is real.
I accept this argument that this is not the Trump pee tape, but I do think there is one. And I want everybody to refer to the scandal as “Goldengate”.
Well, duh.
“I am a deepfake. The most beautiful true authentic deepfake anyone has have ever seen. It’s totally preposterous. No one talks about it - everyone says so.”
When I read pee tape, I thought of a pissing contest.
Then I read “Trump” and still thought this was about a pissing contest.
We need answers.
Foremost, on the question how to get out of this mess, together.
Timeline of the Trump presidency:
Barton Whaley’s excellent book Codeword Barbarossa discusses how the Germans did this to the Russians during World War II. The Nazis realised they couldn’t hide their military buildup on the Russian border for long, so instead they generated tons of bullshit stories – there would be an invasion, but not through Poland, or not until fall, or else it was a feint and they were going to do over Turkey, or Sweden, or it would be Russia but after Britain fell, which would be next week, or whatever. And since Stalin was paranoid enough to believe Hitler in preference to his own spies it was all a big surprise when the stories the British were passing him (confirmed by his man Sorge in Tokyo) turned out to be completely true. Uncle Joe went to bed and stayed there for two weeks.
Everybody knows Drumpf is a thieving greedy rapey crook and his dupes like him that way. If the GOP puts it about that he’s done 100 atrocities, who’s going to know which 30 or 50 or 75 are real? It’ll all be fake news and his base won’t care.
1. The quality and light level are as high as they could be without revealing details of “Trump’s” face and hair, or other trickery.
2. The shaky zoom in and out of Trump, a “mockumentary” cliche.
I don’t believe the above are necessarily deal killers. 1) Trump could have insisted the lighting be low to create a sexy (for him) ambience; and 2) the shaky cam was a last minute thing he requested for later… appraisal. (Some people bring back small stones or shells.)
Still, all that aside, the proof that the dude is Trump is this: Would a normal person still be fully clothed and seated while in the same room with two beautiful babes? I think not.
(didnt read the comments before mine, so I dont know if someone already mentioned this.)
Pixel telling time! I think it’s fake because of two specific things:
The quality and light level are as high as they could be without revealing details of “Trump’s” face and hair, or other trickery.
The shaky zoom in and out of Trump, a “mockumentary” cliche.
what are you talking about, @beschizza ?!? its filmed off from a static screen and the footage itself is a static shot. the zoom just comes from the device which filmed the screen which shows the footage.
the only “shaky” here is the cam which films the static-shot-footage off a projection-screen.
(its actualy beyond me how nobody seems to see this)
It’s not beyond me that many people seem to miss the wink of the winking emoji. Here’s a slightly larger one.
I dont get irony any more. not in these times.
Listen to to the accounts of his victims and this sounds much like his style. He’s a germaphobe.
To my eye it looks like a pro equipment recording but poorly edited “down” to look like a crappy spy camera. Needs more grain.