Not impressive at all…
I clicked expecting something this awesome
And why I get is silly pictures of rocks and an orange pen. 
Sooo … you clicked before reading the text?
Yes, and I know it is against Boingboing terms of service, may Falcor forgive my poor soul.
Now, on a serious tone, I was expecting at least a cool map showing the extent of the dome, a geologist next to a huge rock formation, a rugged old man holding a stone, something BB worthy in it´s quirkiness. But, hey, I must admit educational websites from the 90’s are quite quirky.
I think it’s very gneiss
Even after reading the text I was hoping to see something a little more… Asgardian in the photos myself. 
I like 90s web sites. Information rich and low on JavaScript, just the way I like it. (Also, I’ve long enjoyed using tables for layout, heretical though that may be. What are graphic designers taught on day one of Layout School? “Lay it out on a grid.” And yet, it’s taken 20 years to get a working grid a.k.a. CSS flexbox that finally lets us use the table tag as intended, namely as metadata rather than for its layout properties.)
The hell I did just see?
Tables for layout are bad as they don’t allow for flexibility, specially in this age of multiple screen sizes and orientations. It’s responsivity.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
