I don’t know, seems arbitrary. Tbh, there’s a part of me that wishes this would get appealed to the supreme court.
A taco is a taco. It’s one of the fundamental food shapes. A burrito, on the other hand, is sushi.
Unless the ends of the burrito are folded in, then it’s a calzone. I think.
i, for one, am happy you were not representing the defense in Quintana v. Allen County Commission, as mr. Quintana may have been denied his “sandwich” shop with presentation of your damning evidence.
Correct. Similarly, a hot dog could be either a sandwich or a taco, depending on whether the two halves of the bun remain attached.
He could do quesadillas!
I mostly agree with the chart, but since sushi means sour rice and burrito just means a little pack animal, I think sushi is actually a type of burrito instead of the other way around.
Yeah, also now that I think about it, that would only be for sushi nori. Nigiri is … toast?
What is sashimi then?
Salad or nachos
So a steak is also salad? I’m ok with that.
The Cube Rule of Food results in absurdity. That’s its best feature!
ok, y’all… if all this salad is nachos is sashimi and steak…
where does my shrimp and grits fall?
soup?
(mind you, i will send soupy grits back to the kitchen as fast as you can say “bless your heart”)
That’s a toast. Starch on the bottom, other stuff on top.
If all the world was paper/
and all the seas were ink/
and all the trees
were bread and cheese/
what would we do for drink?
~Lewis Carroll
This isn’t an endless argument. This is friendly disagreement
No it’s not.
(apologies to @FGD135 for stealing your line)
The only truly endless argument is proof by mathematical induction.
like pi(e).