Here’s some more headscratchers:
Nowadays employees are free to choose when signing a contract with their future employer
I feel like a word or two is missing here.
We must always militate in strict compliance with the law.
I didn’t realize “militate” was a word. After looking up its definition, I am even more confused about what this is asking.
I think that one is simpler than it appears. They recommend you invert them if you don’t understand.
Do you think everyone has the right to choose their terms of employment, or that they have to take what’s offered because that’s the least worst option? is how I interpreted it.
Do you believe that if your permit to march and shout is denied, you should meekly go home and stop complaining?
Pretty flag but…
Well this is interesting:
But yeah, a kind of market socialism is something I would prefer since the conept of the state isn’t going to go away overnight. And I wish more of our concerns were focused on preserving nature over exploiting it, but I’m a wannabe hippie too. :3
But I’m always an anarchist first and foremost. 
Yeah, see, that makes perfect sense to me. 
Substitute “militate” with “protest” and it also makes perfect sense.
Were you also very … hesitant? I got the same result.
This one seems to be missing some context:
The filing system should be delimited strictly and database cross-checking should be forbidden.
Uh… is this a programming question or societal one?
That’s the one that threw me and @CarlMud!
Actually a couple others were formally undecidable for me, but that one in particular is just way out there in lalaland… and in either context it makes little to no sense, really. Who will do this forbidding, and how could it possibly be enforced?
It’s like asking what color dress the fairies at the bottom of the garden are wearing, or how many angels can dance on a pinpoint. Pragmatically meaningless in either context.
I would describe it as deeply noncommittal. I had a lot of middle of the road answers.
After going through this confounding yet interesting test, here’s my results. Not quite what I expected.
I guess I’m a SJW through and through.
Just for laughs I did the entire test answering “neutral” for every question, and got an empty flag.
This. Maybe “quite a lot” rather than “some”.
Anyway:
EDIT: Link for results didn’t work, so screenshots it is.
I lost interest around question 70.
Most of the three word descriptions wouldn’t look out of place as the motto for a sc-fi futurecorp/nation.
Equality - Humanity - Justice
Which makes no sense, because I will trample over all y’all for a prettier flag
Ah like with the CDC being prohibited from keeping data on gun violence, since it’d prove that gun violence is both a problem and at least somewhat preventable.
Oh, here’s mine by the way:
All the questions acting as if production was the end-all be-all weirded me out. Like, there’s no point in making shit if all the buyers are dead anyway. Or why keep maximizing production if it’s already adequate? Wouldn’t that just be wasteful?
Oh, also, if we’re going to have capitalism, it needs regulation. Otherwise you’ll see social collapse into feudalism due to oligopolies crushing any resistance to the richest few people owning absolutely everything.
I was thrown by many of the same questions others have mentioned.
