As always, specifically the T.
The people that you dare not speak their name.
Has a familiar ring.
Also - does this mean that their writers who are terfs can’t attend those events?
I’m sure they’ll find a way to make an exception.
So, I’m not Current Affairs now…?
Not sure if that’s good or bad.
Supporting TERs looks like it is BBC policy, in the name of “neutrality”
Is this just due to BBC management or a result of political interference? The BBC’s semi-independence from the government has always been a little opaque to me.
Yes to both.
I give money to both fight and promote transmission of Ebola. My boss requires my free speech to be compelled.
I’m going to get in touch with my local BBC offices about if they want to debate the merits of David Jordan being strung up by his feet and beaten with cricket bats. I’ll be arguing the pro side.
I’m going to have to ask my cable provider to stop carrying BBC America and Britbox as it conflicts with their diversity policies.
Weird that this isn’t coming up on the BBC News page…
The BBC can go get fucked.
This is totally puke-worthy.
I put in a complaint and requested a response.
If it brings joy to one person it was worth it.
If it pisses off at least one person it was still worth it.
Oh, I thought it was, “strung up by his feet OR beaten with cricket bats.” That could be a lively debate. I mean, both sides have valid points.
So presumably BBC journalists will not be wearing poppies or attending Remembrance Day events this year.