Originally published at: https://boingboing.net/2020/10/08/top-medical-journal-get-rid-of-trump.html
…
9 Likes
What will the response from the right be?
“New England isn’t the Real America™!”
“These out-of-touch egghead medical experts with their science don’t care about our jerbs!”
or, as always…
“They’re worried that Q will expose them as child traffickers if Our Great Leader wins. People are saying that these doctors (many of them Jews!) try to stay immortal by drinking the blood of precious children”
Nothing’s too stupid for the GOP’s base.
23 Likes
They could have told us that back in 2015. Cheetolini is bad for your health in general.
5 Likes
Good for them (and institutions like Scientific American) who realize what the stakes are, and shame on all those institutions who pretend that they should or can remain “neutral” in this.
16 Likes
…as well as the whole idea of giving equal time to “both sides of an issue” where one side is clearly discredited. I’m thinking of climate deniers here.
14 Likes
Lock him up! Lock him up!
15 Likes
We fought a revolution to liberate ourselves from New England’s tyranny! Never again!!!
8 Likes
Will this damage his chances of getting the Noble Prize in Medicine?
5 Likes
The NEJM is not focusing only on Trump, but also on those who’ve aided and abetted him in his handling of the response to the virus.
3 Likes
Nope. His chance remains at zero.
3 Likes
The Ignoble Prize.
3 Likes
“Who reads dusty old journals, anyway? We got doctors* on TV that tell us what to do!”
*“doctors”
2 Likes
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
