They were waiting for the New York Times to confirm their proof of weapons of mass communications.
Even as a young boy, I realized that this was a huge leap into a logical void.
Yeah, example #1 and #2 are people who really don’t know what they are doing with guns and are lucky the consequences weren’t worse. Example #3, while hilarious, seems to be a person who is entirely competent with a gun, but apparently needs a new belt.
You are telling me that Newton guy is attacking the 2nd Amendment rights of those people.
How dare he!
One step further: ask him if he wishes to immediately give up all power, control and domination, seeing as he is such a good patriot?
Or, if his visit to the UK comes about, scatter a few three-pin plugs around. (Does the US Ambassador’s residence in London have sockets designed for proper foot-maiming or US-style ‘safety’ sockets?)
Legos on the floor is a perfectly diabolical plan. A bucket full of 1x and 2x bricks would do nicely.
Two (three?) words:
Four-sided dice
If we’re gonna go all the way on caltrops, just pour jacks all over the floor.
Pointy, but bigger than the Legos that can hide in carpet, and hurt the most,
That’s a little like saying your house should be full of booze to ensure that you will “enjoy responsibly.” I can’t imagine anyone outside of industry advertisers could accept that line of reasoning.
Yeah, it’s a question of racial discrimination. If the gummint won’t stop foreign drug dealers from dealing drugs, then surely it shouldn’t stop domestic gun maniacs from buying guns?
Once again, Trump tells the audience at the NRA’s “leadership forum” that he will “never, ever let [them] down.”
Nor will he ever give them up, I suppose, but if he claims he'll never run around and desert them or that he'll never tell a lie and hurt them, they should get a second opinion to go with that amendment they're so fixated on.
This calls for the tiny gears.
Excellent choice.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.