Next he’ll be claiming that he invented the question mark.
4 Likes
WASHINGTON, DC—Calling him “a laughing stock” and “an embarrassment to his country”, American President Donald Trump savaged his North American counterpart with a series of tweets mocking the Canadian Prime Minister for celebrating Thanksgiving “6 weeks early”.
I had to go to the site’s main page to determine it was a parody site.
8 Likes
4 Likes
(Fake news, real humor. The video below it is a must see! Argh, I don’t want to post spoilers.)
3 Likes
Oh, you got me with that one. I totally believed that was real until I read the last sentence.
Isn’t it awful that with the Cheeto-In-Chief, a story that ridiculous is oh-so-believable?
5 Likes
The moral of this story is that people who trust Donald Trump are chumps.
7 Likes
Headline pretty much says it all.
1 Like
Trying to pee on anything Obama did is the only thing that gives him wood.
5 Likes
Maybe he doesn’t realize it’s protocol to stand whenever the president is standing in the same room as you?
3 Likes
Not so srs.
3 Likes
1 Like
Insert rant here about the danger of exploiting homophobia to attack the right.
3 Likes
On a related theme, this thread:
3 Likes
5 Likes
My impression of Trump and his reluctance to disclose details of his finances is not that he’s worried about crimes or dodgy dealings coming out (he probably should be but I don’t think he is - I don’t think he’s capable of caring about those things) but that he just does not want anyone looking at his finances and realising how much less money he actually has compared to what he likes to claim he has.
Dodgy dealings are just what businessmen do as far as he’s concerned. Even if its actually illegal, that just means it’s a stupid law that clearly shouldn’t apply to him.
Not being as rich as he likes to claim - that’s embarrassing. Can’t have that.
6 Likes
3 Likes
Reading that article, I’m really not sure whether to believe that McMaster said those things. It reads like palace intrigue.
It’s tough to read every single news story thinking, “Who wants me to believe this and why?”
2 Likes
That is what’s required, though. The subtext is often more informative than the text.
1 Like
“Sources” raises the flag and you’re right the subtext is telling that someone wants us to believe McMaster is at odds w 45.
Honey pot journalism?
