The LibDems have made that a condition of a coalition. While I was an early critic of Orange Book Liberalism and still am, I have to admit that they have been fairly consistent in supporting trans people.
The problem is that I don’t want a Lib-Lab coalition, and any other combination other than Lab-SNP-Green (or Lab-SNP if that is enough) would quickly tear itself apart as socialists and liberals start fighting.
THE prime minister is to resign today, unless he is lying.
Resign as what, exactly?
What are the chances that he tries to do a Ramsay MacDonald?
Although there was a narrow majority in the Cabinet for drastic reductions in spending, the minority included senior ministers such as Arthur Henderson who made it clear they would resign rather than acquiesce in the cuts. With this unworkable split, on 24 August 1931, MacDonald submitted his resignation and then agreed, on the urging of King George V, to form a National Government with the Conservatives and Liberals. With Henderson taking the lead, MacDonald, Snowden, and Thomas were quickly expelled from the Labour Party.
Suella Braverman genuinely thinks she can credibly stand for the leadership of the Tories.
[Lets that sink in.]
I know!
In 2020, I reported on the false account she gave of her life. She ingratiated herself with the readers of the ConservativeHome website by claiming that, when she started as a barrister in London: “I was the shy Tory in my chambers of ‘right-on’ human rights lawyers. Despite the social stigma, I was inspired by Conservative values of freedom from an interventionist state.”
But the chambers that she joined after leaving Cambridge University were anything but “right on”. She worked at 2-3 Gray’s Inn Square, which was filled with regular barristers fighting disputes about the licensing of pubs and betting shops, not human rights law. One of the supposed “right-on” lefties was a former Tory MP.
The political advantages of posing as a victim of a snotty liberal elite were obvious. But cynical careerism does not explain every move. Vanity can matter as much. Braverman had an ordinary career at the bar, which she tried to make sound grander than it was by claiming to have contributed to authoritative legal textbooks. On inspection they bore no trace of her name.
Her bravado suggests that at some level she may think that a shadowy liberal elite had stymied her rise in the law.
I think you mean a turd on a stick with a blue rosette.
ETA apparently the rules say a candidate must have the support of 8 other Tory MPs in order to stand.
It will be interesting to see if she can find 8 and, if so, who they are.
Also from the same Guardian article quoted above
…proven by the fact that her principled stand consisted of telling Johnson to go but not resigning herself - happy to cling on to her job in his cabinet - at the same time as declaring her candidacy for next leader.
I wonder how the party would react if the final 2 came down to Sunak and Javid? Would they properly embrace a brown leader, or tolerate them until they could get a white saviour?
No, I think Javid/Sunak have made a Blair/Brown pact myself - one of them will drop when the other shows they can reach the last two, and in return, they get the chancellorship. Either of them would fancy their chances against, say, Truss or Mordaunt. And if it gets to the membership, any of them would crush the currently popular Wallace because the membership don’t realise that he’s not an ultraBrexiter but hustings would see to that.