If youâre going to buy something that youâd be embarrassed if the fact that you bought it is publicly known (or any assumptions/assertions that can be made based on the purchase), then you should purchase it in cash from a physical store.
They still have not connected some of the dots yet. If I watch girl-on-girl porn online I get banner ads for gay male cruises. I donât have the citation, but liking girl-on-girl porn is an actual diagnostic standard of heterosexuality in men. So if a woman finds her guy watching girl-on-girl porn, it means he is not gay.
And then do not leave a review on Amazon. BTW, those reviews are comedy gold.
But if weâre talking about big, you ainât seen nothing yet.
B-b-b-baby?
(Naked Lunch)
The County Clerk: "So there I was sitting in front
of Jedâs store over in Cunt Lick my peter standing up
straight as a jack pine under my Levis just apulsinâ in
the sun⌠Weell, old Doc Scranton walks by, a good
old boy too, thereâs not a finer man in this valley than
Doc Scranton. Heâs got a prolapsed asshole and when
he wants to get screwed heâll pass you his ass on three
feet of in-tes-tine⌠If heâs a mind to it he can drop
out a piece of gut reaches from his office clear over to
Royâs Beer Place, and it go feelinâ around lookinâ for a
peter, just afeelinâ around like a blind worm⌠So old
Doc Scranton sees my peter and he stops like a pointinâ
dog and he says to me, âLuke, I can take your pulse
from here.â "
What is not clear from what I read is whether they are assuming that men buy those big toys for themselves, or as I assume, as a bit of wishful thinking related to their partnerâsâŚabilities.
Also, I want more information about this ârabbit holeâ mentioned in the sourceâs title, but I see no such product mentioned on the Lovehoney website.
lol diagnostic standard? Iâm imagining how that doctor visit would go. âThe results so far are showing that you might have Gay, but we want to run a few more tests to be sure. Could you watch these two ladies get it on?â
Of course, I guess it wasnât that long ago that sexuality really was considered as a medical condition, so maybe itâs not as laughable as I imagine.
I find sex, gender, and toys all rather interesting - but this study illustrates IMO exactly the wrong approach, for bringing meaningless criteria to get meaningless results.
Thereâs the assumption of sexual polarity, assumption of gender identification, assumption of consonance with these and and other people (gay, straight, etc). The assumption that toys are capable of having a sex or gender. The assumption of equivalence between toys and human anatomies. And finally the commercial assumptions of purchase = identification, the idea that all of this âsays somethingâ about the buyer. There is also the statistical skew that this data mined from one vendor, as it was interpreted by Google analytics. These assumptions about the toys and people are also built into the Lovehoney website, so the customers are automatically going to âfitâ it whether they identify with these categories or not.
One time a gay friend on Facebook posted something about Putin and then said, âOh well, there is nothing I want in Russia anyway.â
I posted a pic of a shirtless Russian sailor and said, âOh really, nothing?â
Then later Iâm like, âI hope you laughed because I now have âgay russian sailorâ in my search history. God knows what kind of ads Iâll get now.â
Itâs been my experience that straight men buy the super-mutant sex toys more or less for comic effect. Just something to put on display or bring out in the middle of the party, just to see peoplesâ reactions.
Just an expensive joke.
Itâs been my experience that both âstraightâ and âmenâ are only socially fabricated categories, so it only says anything about the society, rather than the individual. Weâd be just as well off polarizing between blue people vs green people, or lemon people vs lime people.
For a moment there I thought Doctorow had a new book coming out.
âDiagnostic standard of heterosexuality in menâ?
It might mean heâs not gay, but if you think it means heâs not bisexual⌠well, you might be misoverestimating your diagnostic skillz. (-:
Hence the existence of the penile plethysmograph. And, for madam, the vaginal photoplethysmograph.
âDiagnostic standard of heterosexuality in menâ?
My sex dungeon has a Plethysmograph.
âHard dataâ
fnarr fnarr
âUK sex-toy retailer Lovehoneyâ, why not Pussy Galore!
Anyone else think itâs odd to measure a butt plug by itâs girth (circumference) rather than its diameter?
I think that some of the men that are probably labeled as âstraightâ in this study donât fit entirely into that category. Heterosexual and homosexual do not really allow for those men that are attracted to hermaphrodites or transgender women who have not had the bottom surgery. A cursory search of craigslist will reveal a sizable population of men who are attracted to women with dicks. So where on the sexuality binary do these men lie? Most of them identify as straight simply because there is no term for their sexuality. And I would think that they would probably make up a large portion of the polled âstraightâ men who buy the large sex toys.
