I apologize unreservedly to any faecal matter I have inadvertently offended by comparing it to the police.
Yes, this message actually brought to you by the patrolmanās ābenevolentā association of the city of New Yorkā¦
Weāll have to wait to find out, after review by the Civilian Complaint Review Board, if indeed an affidavit was not made. The owner does not have to be arrested or convicted of a crime to have his property taken.
Only if the affidavit is confirmed as NOT made can this be labelled as ārobbery.ā
I think that there was a typo ā was supposed to be been violentā¦
Also, Iām fairly sure the affidavit can be issued well after the seizure. Someone will surely correct me if I am wrong on this point.
I sold my motorcycle on Craigslist couple years ago to a guy who paid $5,000 cash in a stack of $100 bills rather than with a cashiers check or bank note. I asked him what he did for a living and he said he was a police officer. He was a nice guy, but the cynical side of me wondered if his stack of cash came from his precinctās evidence locker.
Brilliant.
Iām pretty sure the affidavit can also be created long after the fact, and conveniently dated to fit within whatever time frame is required by departmental policy.
I notice you didnāt mention the receipt. I personally doubt it exists
Here is the āAboutā page for the Civilian Complaint Review Board.
The last sentence of the introductory paragraph (Mission and Rules) it is noted that:[quote]The Board forwards its findings to the police commissioner.[/quote]But I havenāt yet found any indication that the police commissioner has any obligation to act on the Boardās findings.
Also, you talk a lot like @Glitch and your account is less than a day old.
That might be true if asset forfeiture laws werenāt being used to commit robbery.
Donāt act that way. Glitch is proud to be Glitch, and would not employ sock puppets. For the record, I often find myself agreeing with him or her, to my chagrin.
To be fair, I am in substantial agreement with what you say.
As long as the topic doesnāt involve the Law or outrage-inducing-police-activity, I also find him to be at least as sensible as I am. ā
I accept your rebuke.
ā Thatās admittedly a rather low bar, but intended as a back-handed compliment.
Isnāt that legal tender?
-
Black guy.
-
Money.
-
Cop.
-
A bleak history of Racism, Corruption and Mistrust.
-
A society of apologists whoās racism is often disguised as sophistry but fools no-one.
-
āLetās wait and seeā.
-
A functionally unchecked continuation of aforementioned bleak history of Racism, Corruption and Mistrust.
- Profit
I had a
- ???
- Profit
ā¦in there originally but Iāve recently been asked to dial down the snark and on analysis, found I was sorta knee-jerking right to the waterfall.
Expect more cogent and specific sarcasm from me in the future, is what Iām saying.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.