Originally published at: http://boingboing.net/2016/09/06/warning-viewing-these-baby-an.html
…
2 Likes
Re: “That cute otter could grow to 99 pounds, the heaviest of the weasel family.”: anyone with a copy of The New York Times could name half a dozen more massive.
12 Likes
I believe that warning is excessive.
I viewed them and did not die, in fact I was not even harmed.
This distressed me as I thought it might be a humane way to go, but it’s all so much hyperbole.
9 Likes
They disabled right-clicking their images.
Had to use DevTools to get images.
Security theatre. Lame.
3 Likes
7 Likes
challenge accepted
4 Likes
5 Likes
If you’re looking for something that leans a little more towards the humorous side, you might try Terry Deroy Gruber’s - Cat High: The Yearbook.
In a William Wegman-esque collection, Gruber posed cats in clothing (pre-photoshop, this was at least 30 years ago) to make up an entire high school graduating class. Jocks, nerds, mathletes, even a few cultural exchange students.
4 Likes
Assuming I did something to provoke a baby otter or pygmy hippo I think their ability to attack is going to be somewhat limited by their cute outfits.
3 Likes
So… Somebody basically looked at these, smoked some pot and came up with BoJack Horseman?
6 Likes
These are great. If anybody is shopping for a new avatar . . .
4 Likes
i started to flag this as off-topic but then i realized the weasel connection.
4 Likes
Friedman might not be the arch-weasel at the Times, but his mastery of weasel-wording is unforgettable.
4 Likes
Looks like the cast of Wes Anderson movie
6 Likes
Oh, sure. Mention cute animals and then show two pictures in the post. But when you’re advertising a $400 pizza attachment for a grill, I get to scroll through the entire afternoon’s worth of pictures on the front page.
I need a way to use adblock on BS posts like that one. And you need to show more cute animal pics.
4 Likes
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
