The conditions he’s describing are completely normal and couldn’t even remotely be described as “horrible.”
Well, if they are, he should describe what the extraordinary conditions actually are, because so far he hasn’t done that, at all. He’s just described… prison.
“Pile on” what? Everyone’s pointing out that that at this point, literally the only description we have of the conditions are his, but what he’s actually describing doesn’t match his characterization of them. He’s the one making it seem “open and shut” by so effectively undermining his own claims. I can only imagine what he’s like the courtroom, if this is his idea of making a convincing argument:
“Members of the jury, my client is not guilty. It’s true he was found on the night of the murder, standing over the victim, covered in the victim’s blood, holding the murder weapon that only had his fingerprints on it, while screaming, ‘I did it, I killed them,’ And it’s true my client made repeated and graphic threats to murder the victim in the weeks before. I rest my case.”
