Originally published at: Watch these potoroos in a double-decker strawberry snacking session | Boing Boing
…
If you were to pick up one that weighs four pounds, you would be holding an animal that is four-fifths the total weight of a chihuahua.
Whaa??!?
...by my calculations, you'd also be holding an animal that weighs roughly FOUR POUNDSIn what world do most people have an accurate sense of “four fifths” of much of anything, let alone a chihuahua?!?
Is there nothing common that weighs 80% of a chihuahua?!?
How about:
…you’d be holding an animal that weighs roughly the same as four svelte-but-healthy chinchillas
Or maybe:
…you’d be holding an animal that weighs roughly the same as a sack of four-and-a-half dozen parakeets
These comparisons reminded me of a book I saw once at least a half-century ago and have never been able to identify. As I recall it was published by Scientific American in the 1910s, when that magazine was more of a patent news aggregator. The book illustrated “scientific” factoids with strange illustrations/charts using scale to represent number. An example might be “a transatlantic steamship carries 5000 pounds of chicken for passenger meals” accompanied by a drawing of a steamship next to a giant five thousand pound chicken. I don’t recall any chihuahuas, though.
(BTW if anyone knows what that book was, I’d love to find it again.)
Thread:
Ah, 'Stralia. Where the animals that don’t try to kill you with poison and/or teeth and/or claws try to kill you wif da kyoot!!!
Her complete name was Piccalilli Porkchop Twinkletoes.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.