Why (or why not) to vote for Bernie Sanders

I believe the internet has now crashed.

3 Likes

Unfortunately the states that aren’t going to vote for Clinton have to have their say. The alternative would have some pretty terrible consequences.

Clinton is definitely Trump’s easiest target, I guess we’ll be seeing if he can actually pull it off. If Clinton spends the entire election campaigning on what a racist buffoon Trump is, then I think she may well lose it. Unfortunately, I think there is a really good chance she’s going to be surrounded by advisors telling her to do just that.

Oh, I know. I’m not really advocating further disenfranchisement of millions of people.

The whole system is massively disenfranchising as is. Everyone’s vote should count equally, and people in late voting states shouldn’t have their choices curtailed because an utterly different part of the country didn’t like someone month earlier.

I continue to not understand why all states don’t get a say at the same time. Without wanting to go all conspiracy theory, it feels like the order of the states were chosen to help Clinton. And I still think she’s a particularly lousy candidate against Trump. Although she’d do okay against Cruz (or especially) Rubio.

But she’ll probably win Florida and Michigan and that’ll be it and we’re stuck with the lesser of two weevils again. Le sigh.

7 Likes

it feels like the order of the states were chosen to help Clinton.

Both parties exaggerate the power of the red states to make sure they don’t get fucked by the mismatch between popular primart votes and electoral college bullshit.

4 Likes

Me too. And some wine.

6 Likes

Those close to the senator say his message to black voters evolved the longer he spent in the south, that he was fired up by the injustice he encountered and genuinely began to see that racism was a problem that deserved just as much attention as economic inequality. But they acknowledge that this message was less compelling, less authentic-looking, than the class struggle and risked looking opportunistic.

“I worry about him appearing to pander,” said one senior campaign insider privately over the weekend.

This did not go unnoticed among his opponents.

Barbara Boxer, a senator from California, was one of many leading Clinton supporters who resented being accused of being a patsy for the establishment by a colleague who came over as distant from the struggle of many minority voters.

“I’m Barbara Boxer: a Jewish, liberal feminist from California, or as Rush Limbaugh likes to call me, ‘an enemy combatant’,” she joked to journalists at a congressional dinner in Washington on Thursday. “Whereas Bernie Sanders calls me ‘the establishment’. Have you seen Bernie Sanders rallies? I haven’t seen that many white voters since the Oscars.”

I do fear that (much as I personally really like Sanders and his personality), it might have been right message, wrong person. Either that and/or he has an awful lot of Democrat Party resistance to overcome.

3 Likes

Ah well… I guess we’ll just have to bide what little time the planet has left while we wait for the next term, and hopefully Warren will have a crack, fingers crossed. 2020 could be the year, what with Corbyn facing election then. Some of the groundwork has been laid this time around.

How do Warren’s minority credentials stack up, I wonder?

3 Likes
5 Likes

We can’t be sure about that, right? Nate Silver believes Drumpf has a ceiling. And Drumpf’s appeal does seem strongest with GOP conservatives too racist to vote for Rubio or Cruz even though both have more conservative politics than Drumpf.

3 Likes

This is slightly shoe-gaze-y, but don’t write Sanders off yet. Superdelegates don’t mean shit until the convention.
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/03/the-momentum-story-how-the-bernie-sanders-crowd-can-still-win/

8 Likes

He thinks he has a ceilling in the primaries, though, right? In a one-on-one against Clinton I think things are very up-in-the-air. We think Trump’s hardline positions on walls and rounding up Muslims will hurt him, but is he even going to talk about those things in the general?

If the entire election is about “Can Clinton stop Trump” then I think the answer might be “no”. Clinton needs to give people something to believe in - a reason to vote for her. I don’t know if she has that.

7 Likes

Agreed.

True, the general election is up-in-the-air though that’s always true of elections. LBJ won by a landslide in '64, and many voters thought the dems would nominate LBJ for another term in '68.

Nate Silver and others believe Drumpf’s strongest base of voters is white male voters who are not college educated.

So the discussions about whether his campaign has a “ceiling” or not may depend on whether Drumpf can expand that base to enough other white voters.

How hard is that to do?

John Cassidy talked to Ruy Teixeira for The New Yorker who agreed Drumpf’s could win the general election by converting white voters in “rust belt” states.

Teixeira was skeptical though and talked about weaknesses in Drumpf’s campaign message.

. . .
Teixeira cited some more figures for individual states, distinguishing between white working-class voters who didn’t go to college—Drumpf’s base—and white college-educated voters.

In Ohio in 2012, Mitt Romney won the white working-class vote by a sixteen-per-cent margin: fifty-seven per cent to forty-one per cent. According to Teixeira’s projections, Drumpf, to carry Ohio in November, would need to increase this margin to twenty-two or twenty-three points. “That’s a big ask,” Teixeira said.

And Drumpf would also need to retain, or even increase, Romney’s ten-point margin among college-educated white Republicans, even though at least some members of this group may be sufficiently put off by Drumpf’s extremism to stay at home, or even to switch to the Democrats. . . .

To be fair, she is trying. Her stump speeches, policy positions, and gentle leftward drift show it. I don’t know if it’s enough, and given her history of political-position-by-public-polling I don’t know if many will believe her, while Sanders has been consistently fighting the good fight for a long time, so there’s no reason to doubt him.

I think he will try to pivot, though I don’t think he could ever pivot enough to Etch-A-Sketch away the heap of madness on the public record, and given his nature, I’m thinking a pivoted Trump would still be as repulsive. One PAC ad (“Sponsored by the Americans Horrified By Donald Trump PAC”) in the general featuring the photo of Trump in the creepy lech pose with his teenage daughter+his quote on how much he’d totally nail his daughter if only they weren’t related would do a crap-ton of damage, and Hillary wouldn’t have qualms with putting it out there.

2 Likes

I think a analysis around the usual demographic breakdowns will fall flat if Trump does indeed win. It’s easy to say, "He needs a 10 point lead among white college educated Republicans, but I think that ignores too many possibilities. Just like some Republicans may be too put off by Trump’s extremism to vote for him, many Democrats may be so turned on by Trump’s extremism that they vote for him.

To repeat myself from that Sympathy for the Devil Empathy for Trump Supporters article discussion, Trump voters don’t have to be single-issue pro-racism voters, they just have to be willing to tolerate racist views to get other things they want (I imagine this description captures well more than 50% of Americans). If you don’t care about justice, you could argue the two most closely aligned candidates in the race for president are Sanders and Trump. And while I think Sanders himself understands racial inequality, we’ve seen several instances where his supporters seem to think, “Why won’t these black people just do what we tell them and vote for Sanders?” when demographic discussions come up.

Democrats have to worry about Sanders supporters staying home, but some of them aren’t going to stay home, they are going to show up and vote for Trump. Is that going to be 1 in 1000? Is it going to be 1%? If it turns out to be 10% then Trump is going to beat Clinton and pundits who talk about 10 points leads among demographic group X are going to be scratching their heads because they can’t see past left and right.

7 Likes

Indeed. I don’t have a problem with most of what she’s saying (NSA/Snowden stuff aside), I just don’t believe a word of it when she says it. And she’ll not convince me until I see her actually doing it. But without Rand Paul there isn’t a single Republican even saying a single thing that’s better than her on any subject. And significantly worse on most.

Crazy racist narcissist demagoguery aside, Trump is more moderate on many issues than his rivals. See his statements on Planned Parenthood, healthcare, spending on public infrastructure…

Too many do, and it drives me nuts. I think there is a non-insignificant amount of Sanders supporters I’d find really quite unpleasant (true of all candidates, natch).

6 Likes

I won’t stay home in November, primarily because Michigan will invariably have ballot proposals, but I will not vote for Clinton, and I will not vote for Trump. I will vote for Stein or write-in Sanders. If 50% of voters in Michigan want to watch the world burn, it won’t matter if I vote D or G, so I’ll vote my conscience.

Again, I’m not prepared to write Sanders off. Seriously, Clinton’s best states are behind her, Sanders are yet to come. Ann Arbor may not be the best bellwether, but I still haven’t seen a single Clinton bumper sticker or yard sign. At least half the cars in this town are made of bumper stickers, so this is pretty telling of exactly how much support she has here.

8 Likes

True enough. I don’t know enough about the politics to know how Super Tuesday should affect my outlook on Sanders. Obviously it wasn’t positive, but there’s no reason to give up hope.

2 Likes

Stop listening to mass media, which keeps insisting that Clinton has this huge lead, but it’s a sham based on how superdelegates are currently saying they’ll vote. Those don’t count until the convention, and many will shift sides if the wind changes.

2 Likes

5 Likes

I think you’re right; it’s going to be an unfortunate contest between Clinton’s lack of appeal vs. fear of a Trump presidency.

I sat next to an older Republican lady at lunch today who assumed I was also Republican, and who was, rather politely I thought, expressing her disgust at Trump and sanity-checking to make sure she wasn’t the only one who was freaked out by him. She expressed the opinion that Hillary might well be a better choice than Trump.

I haven’t lost hope that Sanders can pull ahead, but I’m more than a little nervous.

No matter who is nominated and how uninspiring they might be, I sincerely hope the left fights hard to GOTV and claw some Congressional seats back from the Tea Party.

4 Likes