The idea that people were throwing money at Clinton were saying she was a stripper is a really obvious deflection from the point. I disagree strongly with using the term “whore” as an insult (“corporate whore”), but that’s in large part because I respect the rights of sex workers and don’t moralize about it.
But those dollar bills had nothing to do with strippers or sex workers, and everyone knows it. Clinton would never sell her own body for money, she’ll just sell out the people of America for money.
And let’s not mistake Sanders supporters for Clinton haters. There is definitely some overlap there, but showering Clinton with dollar bills is something Trump supporters might happily pick up (Trump might even supply the $1 bills). Clinton’s net favourability went negative in April of 2015, way before Sanders was on a sizeable number of people’s minds. People don’t hate Clinton because of Sanders, they hate Clinton because of Clinton.
America is a race to the bottom for ethics. Is there a rule that says she should release her speeches? No. Does everyone else do it? No. Should she do it? Yes.
Can anyone think of a reason not to do so other than she says things in those speeches that people wouldn’t like? By doing so she would start the precedent, since anyone who wanted to attack her for what she said would be rebuked, “Well, I see you don’t release your speeches.”