maggiekb at August 21st, 2013 11:57 — #1
kansas at August 21st, 2013 12:07 — #2
rogowar at August 21st, 2013 12:59 — #3
Are we talking double the stuff by weight, or volume. Seems to me the volume is quite possibly double, but the double stuffed are much creamier. I'm guessing that means the filling is whipped with much more air. The regular stuffed seem stiffer. Devil. Details. Have the methods been posted for peer review?
I have officially used up all my Oreo allotted brain cycles.
remusshepherd at August 21st, 2013 13:13 — #4
The measurements were by weight, so maybe Nabisco is avoiding a lie because they measure by volume.
Either way, it's an embarrassment for them.
wearysky at August 21st, 2013 13:38 — #5
The teacher has a follow-up post, doing another test with some more cookies:
I'm still not convinced with his methodology, do we know if the wafers are all the same size for all types of Oreos? He doesn't seem to split out Double Stuf or Mega Stuf wafers and weigh them separately, but rather weighs them all together. This calls for more science!
kmoser at August 21st, 2013 16:36 — #6
I'm still waiting for the study to determine how much more ice cream is in a FatBoy compared with a regular ice cream sandwich.
sockdoll at August 21st, 2013 18:48 — #7
My dad turned 80 yesterday and told me that he still eats four regular-sized Oreos a day. He says that he can stop at two when eating other kinds of cookies but when he eats Oreos he has to have four. I think he prefers regular Oreos to the Double-Stuf ones though.
dioptase1 at August 22nd, 2013 06:16 — #8
I'm in the same camp as your dad. Regular beat Double Stuff hands down. I'm waiting for 1/2 Stuff, or Stuffless.
Hmmm, now I'm contemplating the ramifications of Negative Stuff Oreos. Or how about iStuff Oreos? Should those be square, or would that make them into -1Stuff Oreos again?
Then there are the flavored stuff Oreos. They have some sort of imaginary flavoring, so maybe that makes them iStuff. Or is it part imaginary, part real? Some sort of Vector Oreo.
Guess that makes the Oreo sticks some sort of Non-Euclidean Stuff Oreos.
Yeah, I'm a mathematician and it's past my bedtime. If only I had milk and cookies.
steampunkbanana at August 22nd, 2013 10:58 — #9
I'm waiting for Nabisco to just sell cookies and stuffing and get out of the preparation business with a press release stating in full: "Just make yourselves happy, we just don't care anymore."
steven_patz at August 22nd, 2013 22:10 — #10
No one's mentioned that Oreos were inferior to Hydrox.
donald_petersen at August 22nd, 2013 22:15 — #11
I just figured Harlan Ellison could have the last word on that and I, Double Stuf eater, would carry on with my tooth-encrusted life.
technogeekagain at August 22nd, 2013 22:40 — #12
Matter of taste. I prefer oreo cookies but hydrox ice cream.
echolocatechoco at August 22nd, 2013 22:54 — #13
It clearly says "Stuf" on the packaging.
"Stuf" is 80% of "Stuff", therefore "Double Stuf" is only 1.6 x more than "Stuff". 1.86 is, in fact, very generous.
codinghorror at August 23rd, 2013 04:23 — #14
Do not fill this forum with your scandalous lies!
maggiekb at August 26th, 2013 11:57 — #15
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.