The story in which Drumpf threatens to invade MexicoâŚ
http://www.sfgate.com/news/politics/article/Trump-to-Mexico-Take-care-of-bad-hombres-or-US-10901453.php
9 Likes
So this week weâve threatened to invade Iran and Mexico⌠Great.
13 Likes
Apparently theyâre denying the Mexico story.
I canât help but feel weâre just being trolled.
9 Likes
He is the troll in chief!
8 Likes
Trolled or gaslighted
6 Likes
10 Likes
I think that Flynn also mentioned YemenâŚ
Edit: donât forget that we are going to invade Chicago as well.
13 Likes
At this point, doesnât he realize there isnât much Yemen to invade? The Saudis have been pounding the resistance there for the past few years and weâve been droning the place for longer. What was once a relatively modern, secular, socialist state, is in fucking shambles.
This might be the most unhumanitarian administration weâve had since NixonâŚ
10 Likes
At least they are talking to the PentagonâŚ
The announcement was not accompanied by any change in the US military stance in the region, nor any immediate additional deployments.âWe saw the statement as well,â said a spokesman for US central command, which runs operations in the Middle East. âThis is still at the policy level, and we are waiting for something to come down the line. We have not been asked to change anything operationally in the region.â
The Pentagon was informed before the announcement and the defense secretary, James Mattis, prevailed upon Flynn to soften his language about Iran from an earlier version. At the time of the Flynnâs statement, Mattis was en route to Asia for an official visit to Japan and South Korea.
4 Likes
Only with Nixon, the liberals showed some backbone and got shit done.
10 Likes
Four moreâŚ
8 Likes
Remember the good old days when we thought that another Bush in the Whitehouse would be the worst thing evar?
Edit: granted, he is calling for an edit, not a withdrawalâŚ
8 Likes
The speed at which shit is happening he may make Andrew Jackson look like a nice guy.
Fuck fuckity fuck.
10 Likes
Iâm assuming that he didnât threaten to invade at leastâŚ
No âGâday, mateâ: On call with Australian prime minister, Trump badgers and brags - The Washington Post
It should have been one of the most congenial calls for the new commander in chief â a conversation with the leader of Australia, one of Americaâs staunchest allies, at the end of a triumphant week.Instead, President Trump blasted Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull over a refuÂgee agreement and boasted about the magnitude of his electoral college win, according to senior U.S. officials briefed on the Saturday exchange. Then, 25 minutes into what was expected to be an hour-long call, Trump abruptly ended it.
At one point Trump informed Turnbull that he had spoken with four other world leaders that day â including Russian President VladiÂmir Putin â and that, âThis was the worst call by far.â
Time for Repubs to take @stefanjonesâ suggestion to implement an Amendment 25 / Section 5 action to remove Trump, 'cause he is batshit nutz
Edit: this got a laugh from meâŚ
https://twitter.com/tchopstl_/status/826960672831524864
12 Likes
I, for one, have only ever accused you of running one account deplorably. 
13 Likes
11 Likes
Do they define âreligiousâ as only including christians?
8 Likes
Of course not! That would be totally unconstitutional!
This is about freedom!
10 Likes
Technically, no.
Practically, yes.
(c) The Secretary of the Treasury shall ensure that the Department of the Treasury shall not impose any tax or tax penalty, delay or deny tax-exempt status, or disallow tax deductions made under 26 U.S.C.501(c)(3) or otherwise make unavailable or deny any tax benefit to any person, synagogue, house of worship or other religious organization,
(1) on the basis of such person or organization speaking on moral or political issues from a religious perspective where religious speech of similar character has consistent with law, not ordinarily been treated as an intervention in a political campaign by the Department of the Treasury, or
(2) on the basis that such person or organization believes, speaks, or acts (or declines to act) in accordance with the belief that marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman, sexual relations are properly reserved for such a marriage, male and female and their equivalents refer to an individualâs immutable biological sex as objectively determined by anatomy, physiology, or genetics at or before birth, and that human life begins at conception and merits protection at all stages of life.
Because those are totally religiously neutral criteria.
12 Likes
Sounds like they are supporting sharia law of the 'murâcan taliban flavor, thus this should not apply in many US States.
9 Likes
