Through her parents-in-law, she has a connection to the Young Americaās Foundation. I suspect that she has her own personal involvement. Groups like that also draft template legislation and regulations, and then farm it out to their fellow traveler subscribing legislators. Thatās why the same type of bills get introduced across several states at the same time. (Things I learned watching Scientology and their infiltration of the National Foundation for Women Legislators.)
Is it weird that Iām with Trump on this one? it feels really weirdā¦
Iād hazard to say that anyone who isnāt an investor in these companies or somehow profiting from it also feels that creating a telecom behemoth is extremely bad for the country. Itās safe to say Trump isnāt profiting.
https://twitter.com/carlbeijer/status/1006972036042747905?s=21
https://twitter.com/carlbeijer/status/1006990318041026561?s=21
Strong support from women and minorities, opposition from white dudes. Particularly wealthy white dudes.
And yet the Bernie Bro narrative persists. Itās almost as if there were a well-funded propaganda organisation dedicated to keeping it alive.
More interesting polling in this thread:
And:
A source familiar with the matter tells ABC News that among the reasons for Cohenās change in counsel is a fee dispute.
Why does that not surprise me?
Only Bannon would think that adding bigotry to the blockchain is a good idea
Remember all the shit Obama for after he had the gall to ābowā to the SA king? The Right had an absolute conniption. Controversy followed (did he or didnāt he). Think pieces were written. Monocles were popped.
Trump says, āhold my non-alcoholic beerā.
The first four paragraphs of this Daily Beast article⦠THESE FOUR FUCKING PARAGRAPHSā¦
It started with a question from CNNās Jim Acosta. āWhere does it say in the Bible that itās moral to take children away from their mothers?ā he asked White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders during Thursdayās briefing.
Acosta was referring to a justification put forward by Attorney General Jeff Sessions earlier in the day during a meeting with religious leaders in Indiana for the administrationās policy of separating children from their parents at the border.
"Illegal entry into the United States is a crimeāas it should be. Persons who violate the law of our nation are subject to prosecution,ā Sessions said. āI would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained them for the purpose of order.ā
While Sanders said she was ānot awareā of Sessionsā comments, she answered: āI can say that it is very Biblical to enforce the law. That is actually repeated a number of times throughout the Bible.ā
When Sanders leaves the Trump regime as has been rumored lately I wonder what her apology tour will be like. Spicer managed to somehow rehabilitate his image if even slightly. Scaramucci simply didnāt give a fuck before or afterward. But Sanders? I donāt think anybody will ever forgive her for the shit she pulled.
Time to double down and get other states involved; Iām sure it wasnāt just in NY where they were doing this shit.
Hell had better be real, because I want these assholes to spend eternity there for trying to shroud their monstrosity in a cloak of piety.
Sanders strikes me as a potentially powerful politician in her own right; with her background and high profile, she could easily stand on her own if she somehow āmade amendsā or denounced Trump⦠or even if she didnāt and celebrated her past but made a big show out of ābeing able to now speak her mindā.
Apparently theyāre both still pretending that separating families and detaining these people is a law⦠which it is not. Theyāre actions ordered by the administration. They arenāt enforcing any existing law. Theyāre just choosing to do this.
Not quite sure where to put this. Here will do.