Now, letās come back to your posts as promised.
That is true.
However, the rethorics have changed: while the Wales Summit has a declaration defining a target, it is no contract, and has no due dates. The Trumpist@s change the game mid-run, and they donāt negotiate but blackmail. This has never happened before. The US-European relationship has had an imbalance in power ever since NATO was founded, but it was in the long-term interest of the US. Trump is laying an axe on this with his inconsistent style of daily changes in good cop-bad cop bullshit. NATO is about war (or defense, same same), and that means geopolitics. The US had problematic, but consistent general policies, and the European partners systematically adapted their own policies to that. Iām by no means involved in transatlantic politics, but I donāt doubt for a second that the danger Trumpās 4% blackmail bullshit is a shock to this community. Youāve probably seen the headlines that the US are no longer to be considered a staunch ally. Hell, even in the US headlines are out that Trump is no longer the leader of the free world (whatever that is).
So, my point is not a push for more financial contributions by member states. My point is that NATO is no longer the reliable backbone of geopolitics for itās member states.
[Regarding Trump sabotaging EU/UK negotiations]
My argument boils down to the fact that they are still somehow containable. They are part of a domestic power balance, which wobbles hither and thither, but has some fix points in the political system. They can try to disrupt or even destroy the system from within, but said system has, ermā¦ excuse my wording: checks and balances.
Trump, OTH, is pulling strings from outside, and there are no checks on him any longer if he doesnāt comply to diplomatic standards. There are reasons why it is highly irregular for foreign representatives to comment on domestic issues. These reasons evolved through a hell lot of wars, many of them in Europe.
Tru dat. But being the representative of a superpower, and not being in any way accountable to domestic laws in any European country makes him extremely influential. See above on NATO and on checks and balances within a democratic system.
From an informed German POV, I have to say that Merkelās line has moved a lot since 2015, and what has been happening lately is Symbolpolitik. There is no general āacceptanceā of refugees, and there hasnāt been one even in 2015. Itās hard not to digress, so I rather donāt try to unfold this.
What is important, though, is that Seehoferās actions have an echo. And quite a remarkable one. The European consequences are, again, much Symbolpolitik so far. (The borders are pretty much closed since last year, at least.) It remains to be seen if his political stunt will win his party any votes in the regional elections, BTW. Quite some people have publicly criticised him, personally and publicly, from various important branches of German society. The jury is already in, so to say, and the verdict is he has lost it. Letās wait for the elections to see if he lost those, too.
Now, to your point again that Trump and the right wing asshats in Europe are in a mutual relationship: I donāt disagree, but I would maintain that Trump has much more influence on overall politics and, in the long run, on European policies than the European neo-fascists. Even though right-wing populists are in power in Italy, Austria, Slovakia, Poland and Hungary, full-frontal fascism is still not normalised here (did I miss a country? Sure I did, but Iām quite tired). Trump, however, is the new normal. The US are the greatest cultural, economic and, yes, political influence on European politics. The EU doesnāt automatically speak with one voice, but nearly all Europeans accept that the US do. Trump is the Voice of America. Your checks and balances are hardly perceptible over here. You are the bully in the schoolyard, now quite literally. You are, I am sorry to say, Trump. As you have been Dubbyah. And , yes, as you have been Obama.
You are more important than you probably think you are.
Oh, BTW, this has a stupid headline, but is worth a read:
(Basically says Trump is trying to destroy the EU to have only to deal with China in the long run. I think thatās possible.)