Main, womain and childrain.
HOW IS BABBY FORMED?Â
ALL UR BASE R BAELONG 2 UZ.
You have no chance.
Make your time.
Shorter version of form:
âWill the Secretary of DHS be publicly embarrassed if you are granted a green card?â
âYes⌠I mean no! No!! Damn you, anti-terrorist form! Youâve foiled my nefarious plans with your poorly written questions.â
I noticed that too. But also the meta issue: we think procreation is sacred, so how dare you do anything to hamper that, but notice thereâs no equivalent question about forcing a woman to carry a pregnancy against her will, or refusing sterilization to a man or woman who wants it?
Are you a member of or affiliated with the Communist or other totalitarian party?
Totalitarianism is a political system in which the state holds total control over the society and seeks to control all aspects of public and private life wherever possible.
So, affiliation with our totalitarian capitalist government applies, right?
Like most everyone else on this thread, I canât think of anything useful or serious to offer, which seems a shame, because Cory is not even kidding. Instead of sympathy or advice, I am reduced to humor.
You know what would be funny? Mashing up the âDo you feel lucky?â scene from Dirty Harry with each of the Green Card questions:
"I know what youâre thinking: âHas he asked six questions or only five?â Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement, Iâve kinda lost track myself. But being this is a Green Card questionnaire, the most powerful document in the border control system, and would blow your passport clean off, youâve got to ask yourself one question: âAm I a health care worker seeking to perform such work in the United States but have not yet received certification from the Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools or from a equivalent approved independent credentialing organization?â Well, are ya, punk?
I knew someone who was denied on the basis of âmoral turpitudeâ and I believe he was quite chuffed by the distinction.
In other words, are you threatening to lower the healthcare costs and the associated profits by bringing in the medical knowledge without also bringing in a crushing mountain of school debt?
The State Department has a set of guidelines as to what constitutes moral turpitude for immigration purposes. Basically, it requires a conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude.
A conviction for a statutory offense will involve moral turpitude if one or more of the elements of that offense have been determined to involve moral turpitude. The most common elements involving moral turpitude are:
(1) Fraud;
(2) Larceny; and
(3) Intent to harm persons or things.
Rape, embezzlement, murder, extortion and robbery are examples of crimes that involve moral turpitude. Some crimes that do not involve it would be simple assault, libel, drunkenness and desertion from the armed forces.
Iâve sung karaoke. I wouldnât be allowed in.
This is the questionnaire version of the $5,000 apple story. You know the one: Boy selling apples on the road for $5,000 each. Person says itâs too high for an apple. Boy responds that he only has to sell one.
I guess the US government is waiting for the one idiot who checks off the YES box on any of these, including the genocide one.
A higher degree of turp than would be acceptable to a reasonable person of average morality.
Re the fourth and fifth questions from the end: ââŚexpropriated in a foreign nation to which a United States national has claim of ownership?â I really hope that the word âpropertyâ was omitted after âexpropriatedâ, but I fear the worst.
Seriously, how many years has this wording been on the list without anyone reading it?
Sometimes itâs easier to depart undesirables for perjury than for the crimes they allegedly lied about. For some reason, John Demjanjuk comes to mind.
I wouldnât (and consequently donât) expect it based on pattern recognition of US hypocrisy, though I would want that consistency from a moral perspective. Which is why I pointed out the hypocrisy with a sarcastic remark.
Which is completely intentional - as someone said upthread - that would then be lying on the form and grounds to deport you.
Just something to be kept in the âpermanent recordâ in case it is ever needed
What we put up with in natural born citizens (whom we donât get a choice in accepting as citizens) is not necessarily the bar we want to put in place for foreigners whom we explicitly decide to accept as citizens.
Iâm not saying that these questions arenât over the top but I donât think it is especially inconsistent to have a higher bar for immigrants than people born here. We already have enough stupid, criminal people. We donât need to import more.
I, for one, am totally against height requirements for immigrants.
Well, you say that, but some people try.