I mean, how do we really know it’s 12? Who’s your source on that?
You still believe THEM? It’s 2021. Get with the program.
In Florida, it’s Florida Man. Elsewhere, Morans.
I mean, how do we really know it’s 12? Who’s your source on that?
You still believe THEM? It’s 2021. Get with the program.
In Florida, it’s Florida Man. Elsewhere, Morans.
It’s also a halfway decent explanation as to why these people are certain Trump actually won the election. I thought about that when the guy in the capital building yelled at security that there were “millions of us” out there. The seemingly innate inability to count might be a contributing factor to the ‘stop the steal’ madness.
Ouch. I’ve heard of people losing toes and such. That’s pretty bad.
I’m diabetic but I keep mine under control.
Now ask her if she’d like to receive a dozen lashes or fifty.
That seems the most likely scenario. Thanks for the info.
I see what you did there
My guess is that AK is trying to pull one over on the Dunkin’ Donuts people (very poorly I must add).
Wonder where on earth she got the idea that a dozen of something was fifty of said item? Schooling is not what it was, y’know.
Looks like a Trump supporter to me.
I mean, you’re right, and everything . . . but I would still bet my left testicle she’s ‘trumpy’.
If I might be so bold, I’d say the stupidity is the tool for bludgeoning her point across. “Hear this voice/anger/certainty? That’s the sound of me getting my way so get a move on, you counterperson!” It’s the red herring the victim has to deal with while morality and intellect are, um, wanting.
Perhaps she counts in Base-48?
So, like, fifty in binary is 110010. There is an eleven in there, and some zero’s and a one, so if you add that up, 50 is totally 12, if you think about it.
base 48 numerals will never catch on.
Baker’s dozen: 13. Banker’s dozen: 11
You could say “two score and ten”, but nobody would understand…
Ah yes, triunal hexadecimal, widely used in the vatican computing cluster.
You must be from the US North. In the South it’s “a couple-two-three”