Originally published at: Anti-Semites demand $100,000 from Sheriff Chitwood. He offers them pacifiers | Boing Boing
…
13 Likes
Yeah, I choose neither side, but…
20 Likes
…demanding payment of $100,000 in gold.
Fucking Nazis.
39 Likes
What is it with Nazis and gold?
33 Likes
It’s a hedge against inflation? You can make fillings with it or even some really fly personal hygiene products!
5 Likes
Or acquire it from fillings, as the Nazis were infamously wont to do.
10 Likes
Ick, yeah.*
*Am Jewish
10 Likes
ACAB, but this guy seems to be on the less-bastardly side of the spectrum. Given that this is a pretty binary situation, I will take the less-bastardly cop over the overt Nazis. I would take a pile of scrofulous digo kidneys over Nazis, though. So there is that.
42 Likes
Pretty bold move to try and get someone to take down a literal anti-Nazi tweet…
14 Likes
Flushing people with inalienable rights…
It sounds like a great demonstration of their core values 
6 Likes
Is the Jewish Defense League still a thing?
1 Like
Nazis have no rights as far as I am concerned.
Anyone who actively wants to destroy society is NOT part of that society, and is owed none of its’ benefits, IMO.
29 Likes
Absolutely understood. Just remarking on the irony of Nazis objecting to not recognizing peoples’ rights; it’s disingenuous as best. They don’t recognize anyone else’s rights, so they’re limited on their ability to claim the same.
They’re not value-driven: it’s hypocrisy and contradiction all the way down.
12 Likes
Oh, for sure.
18 Likes
Much worse, they only recognize their own rights, because anyone in an out group is sub-human and has no rights whatsoever. The fact that in living memory there was a world-spanning war that killed millions in order to stop this ideology, and yet here we are again is incredibly damning.
26 Likes
In that sense, rights don’t exist at all. There are simply the rulers and the ruled. Who needs rights when you have power?
4 Likes
Split the difference and give them pacifiers spray painted gold?
4 Likes
As I am wont to say, Intolerance of intolerance is not intolerant; It’s calling a spade a spade.
6 Likes
