What license? Do you mean registration? All that means is that the gun is registered and the person who buys it, their name is associated with it until they give it to someone else, sell it, or put gun stickers on their car and it’s stolen.
So if you have the dress, you could get the pants and be the Girl with the Dragon Pants, Too.
This brings to mind the odd situation with the import of Kinder Eggs into the USA being banned.
Conceal a toy within some chocolate- dangerous, illegal and must be stopped.
Conceal a handgun in a public place- perfectly fine, legal and patriotic.
There are jackets w/the same print, too. Men’s, women’s, long, short
Oh, they got some cute stuff!
Thanks for sharing!
Wait, that wasn’t due to the salmonella outbreak?
Ew. Will do, thank you.
Thank you for refuting this myth. I was taught growing up that everyone is a good guy in their own mind, and there’s almost always some common ground you can use to appeal to their basic human nature- some core, absolute basic values that everyone shares to some degree. Anyone who still believes this hasn’t learned enough during the past 7 years. Cartoonishly shameless, self-aware villainy is very much a real thing, sadly.
Maybe not so much self-awareness, though. This particular study was looking at cases where the gun owner defined the situation as “self-defense,” even when their own description contradicted that characterization. It was basically super-solipsistic, where the gun owner’s fears and selfish sense of how they should be respected by others drove their interactions. They saw others as threats when, from the view of anyone else, they were the actual threat.
I was taught growing up that everyone is a good guy in their own mind, and there’s almost always some common ground you can use to appeal to their basic human nature- some core, absolute basic values that everyone shares to some degree.
Considering yourself “the good guy” doesn’t mean everyone has basic values that they all share and can be appealed to. Some people consider themselves “good guys” regardless of what they do. It’s a sense of being good rather than doing good. It is also extended to their in-group. So if a pastor is caught in an affair, “he’s a good man of god and that jezebel must have seduced him!” but if a black man with a gun stopped an active shooter, the same person might possibly say, “he was probably there to rob the place.” If a “good guy” does something objectively wrong, he and his in-group can call it a bad day or a poor decision or a blm/antifa crisis actor false flag conspiracy to defame a good person.
What could go wrong? #WCGW
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.