Speech recognition? That kind of stroking takes both hands.
(I thought affluent owner was part of the standard package?)
Speech recognition? That kind of stroking takes both hands.
(I thought affluent owner was part of the standard package?)
âThis luxury yacht is owned by a shift worker at a grocery store with three mortgages and student loans.â
Pressure Drop is the only legitimate vessel in that list.
I have a new idea for the rest though. I heard on the news today that Turkey is still touchy about letting minesweepers transit the Bosporus. These yachts arenât military vessels. Just get them to the Black Sea and ram them into any mines they see. Itâs a win-win for the world
I dunno. Pollution. Not sure what the solution to getting rid of them is but billionaires are the most toxic of waste we produce.
Caution is needed.
Do we need to start the âTrillionaire chroniclesâ topic?
Les Tricoteuses chronicles?
No. We need to start shopping for guillotines.
I think weâre going to have to automate that a bit - a whole line of them in one.
Disrupt billionaires
Using AI! And blockchain!
Iâm imagining a hat like oddjobâs, but an autonomous drone.
i thought this coverage had an interesting take
âIf youâre going to have tax policy that will redistribute income in favor of the poor⌠youâre going to find it very difficult,â says John Mukum Mbaku, an economist at Weber State University [because] the wealthy can influence policy-making.
Instead, governments should invest in improved public services to propel people out of poverty [ by ] improving access to free or low-cost education, medical care, nutritious food, clean water and basic sanitationâŚ
âEducation should be considered by governments as an investment in human capital development [ and ] the future of your country.â
Itâs an intervention the Oxfam report recommends as well, saying that investing in people and communities provides "the best bulwark against extreme corporate power
my take: that the wealthiest made 3% above inflation over these last few years is just insane.
I mean, why do they think education and other public spending has been so defunded? The wealthy have influenced policy to defund it in order to reduce or eliminate tax policies that redistributed weath to the poor in the form of such policies.
yeah, i caught that too. iâm guessing that he feels itâs easier to argue for that specifically than for higher taxes, stock transaction taxes, a wealth tax, etc. in and of themselves
and here in the states, if you look at bidenâs policies, you do kind of see that. a push for free education, but not a strong push for raising taxes on the wealthy and corporations
For the US, I think the opposite is the most feasible, politically. The public has been so programmed and misdirected with education, healthcare, etc. and itâs easy to confuse the issue. Instead, itâs really easy to say, âthese people have too much money and these people doât have enough. Letâs take some from this pile and put it in that pile.â Itâs so straightforward that the right-wing playbook of distraction and misinformation has a tougher time manipulating public opinion.
They have set up foundations and think tanks that will influence policy from beyond their graves.
Not if a large part of the electorate see themselves as temporarily embarrassed billionaires and the people who would receive the money as undeserving layabouts (even if they themselves would be on the receiving end)