Cards Against Humanity to pay "blue leaning" nonvoters $100 to vote

Originally published at: Cards Against Humanity to pay "blue leaning" nonvoters $100 to vote - Boing Boing

9 Likes

This is kinda great, but like Colbert’s superpac from 2011, this is also a really depressing, laughing through tears, illustration of how broken our democracy is.

They bought everyone’s voting records and are paying people to vote for a particular candidate, and it ain’t just legal, it’s also tax-exempt.

26 Likes

I look forward to your continued constructive criticism.

11 Likes

That user quickly identified as “not welcome here.”

14 Likes

In a way, they were helpful after all.

15 Likes

I can imagine that rewarding people for the act of voting is probably not entirely illegal, as plenty of businesses will give you a free coffee or whatever if you present your “I voted” sticker.
But is it really legal to explicitly pay people to vote for a particular candidate? How does that get around Federal law?

(I got the impression that the Cards Against Humanity folks aren’t requiring anyone to prove that they voted for a specific candidate)

Edit to add: based on the FAQ section they’re apparently not paying people to vote. Just to post an apology and make a voting plan. So they could do that, not actually vote, and still get paid, I guess?

9 Likes

It’s skirting the edges. They’re paying people to have a voting plan (legal) and also to publically disparage – but not vote against – one of the candidates (also legal). Put together, they might still be legal because technically one can still vote for a non-duopoly candidate. Where they might get in trouble is the “blue-leaning” phrase, but we’ll see.

As for me, I’m all for it. I also like the point they make about the dyfunctional system by only offering two bucks and change if you live in a non-swing state.

11 Likes

It’s ironic that the Cards Against Humanity guy actually seems to care about humanity.

9 Likes

Small note, they seem to be prepared to pay you a lesser amount if you decline to post to social media, though I don’t know the actual figure. In my case due to my voting history and location they were offering me $0.19, or $0.17 with no post.

Meanwhile, handing out bottles of water to people standing in line for hours to vote (with no indication of who is voting for whom) is illegal in some places.

7 Likes

If only there were some way of determining which voting regions mysteriously happen to have far too few polling places, making long wait times and unpaid leave and standing in the hot sun without water necessary.

If only there were some common factor there which would help us explain this situation.

8 Likes

This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.