That’s a good one, but also ad hominem.
don’t forget slavecatching and suppressing slave uprisings.
Let’s take the guns away from these “right to bear arms” wing nuts and instead let them arm themselves with knives and swords.
Very rarely are there incidences of drive by skewerings and if they did happen all the people in the building behind them or on the next block over would be safe from poorly aimed sword strikes.
That phrase strikes me as more than a little euphemistic.
That wiki article is pretty bad, though. It completely fails to consider the distinction between people defending themselves against genocidal invaders, and acts of genocidal aggression.
There’s also the broader issue that the bulk of the genocide occurred due to unrecorded day-to-day attrition rather than in a handful of dramatic atrocities. And continues to this day, as the police shooting stats demonstrate.
The dispossession hasn’t stopped, either; see DAPL and the Water Protectors. That’s been a non-stop event from day one.
I like the whole “I didn’t feel safe around town so I got my conceal carry…”
Yeah, I wouldn’t feel safe with all these yahoos hiding guns on them.
How I see these guys:
Maybe they eat a lot of bran to regulate themselves.
Are we certain that they aren’t actually the Enclave?
Kind of implies it is a Sacrifice Tree that needs regular feeding. Bit scary…
Bears repeating: socialist =/= pacifist.
I’m not defending it, just pointing it out.
My point is only that the Founding Fathers were of the opinion that the people might need to fight the government.
For a second I thought that was a real world thing and I was about to say that I’d never heard of this conspiracy theory, but then I noticed you linked to a fallout wiki!
You’re telling me Fallout isn’t a documentary?
A future-mentary?
As in after a true story?
“tornado in a teacup”
love it
So maybe something like Switzerland where everybody has a machine gun (or grenades, mortars etc) in their house and a designated rally point in their town?
This was a difficult documentary to get through as I listened to the milita members’ broken logic to justify what they do and how they train. To me, it seems like they’re primarily training for the fantasy that they’ll be the well armed thugs to take over and rule over a town if the government becomes attacked and rule of law isn’t able to be maintained. Seriously, why do they need to train to order people out of their vehicles while pointing a gun at the driver. That doesn’t seem like someone with the motive to preserve and save individual liberty.
And their patch of a hybrid mix of the U.S. & Confederate flag was revolting to see.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.