Duggar parents explain how women defraud by the way they dress

Or get him to do!

3 Likes

That might be a tad much for me personally, but I getcha.

Nay 

I remember one of the first novel things I stumbled on when I got internet access was a Christian BDSM scene that focused on the ā€œtraditional rolesā€ of Bible times. I forget the exacts, but in retrospect, these people sounded healthier in many aspects. They could compartmentalize and separate the past from present, accepting that we’re different.

Perhaps I was too optimistic as I never interacted with them, but I’d like to think that they put a little thought into their current lifestyl and gender roles in the process.

As much as the golden rule is appreciated as wise, it still kinda sucks. I mean, what if you’re a masochist?

ā€œDo unto others what you would have them do unto you… With a pair of handcuffs and a bullwhip. Also don’t stop when they say you’re hurting them. That’s not the safeword.ā€

I prefer the Platinum rule myself, ā€œDo unto others as they would have you do unto them.ā€

That way your judgment on how to treat people is informed by their preferences, and not your own.

Because other people aren’t you.

5 Likes

Yah the golden rule is flawed. If we followed it & the rest of the bible our ideal concept of ā€œConsentā€ would be making sure everyone had a safeword incorporated into their trampstamp and there would still be hundreds of loopholes.

3 Likes

They have a problem with set theory? Seriously? What’s next? Do they also deny the validity of histograms, Venn-diagrams and logarithms?

1 Like

If you’re so pissed off at women for forcing you into being a slathering idiot who just can’t control himself, why don’t you move to Saudi Arabia. I’m sure the Wahhabis will welcome you with open arms, and plenty of rocks to throw at shameful sluts who are asking to get stoned to death by the way they dress.

4 Likes

So the logical corollary is . . . . they should all be nude?

8 Likes

SET THEORY IS UNGODLY!!! Duh!

2 Likes

But the masochist argument and the platinum rule simply shifts empathy and responsibility.

There are no hard and set rules, but when it comes to game theory that has the best chance of benefitting the most people (Spock face on) I think Do unto others is about as good as we can get. With 25 amendments.

1 Like

(BTW, that’s Maggie speaking; my own religious upbringing was liberal)

7 Likes

Because sets are weird. A set can contain an infinity of sets each containing its own infinity. And God is infinite and there can be only One. Or something.

And my take on the modesty thing? Wear whatever you like, feel free. I’m quite capable of admiring the scenery without touching and of keeping a straight face and holding back the laughter until later …

But like everyone else, I only have a limited amount of bandwidth for logical thought. So if you want my best possible response, then dressing in a manner that allows me to concentrate on what you want to talk about, rather than on deliberately ignoring what you are or are not wearing might be sensible. Your call. Applies to males and females equally. :slight_smile:

2 Likes

Perhaps. It could be a personal preference, but I always seem to get really bad results when I assume someone is like me and would prefer to be treated the way I like. I tend to get much better results when I don’t make assumptions about someone else, and instead let them tell me how they want to be treated.

The way I see it, the golden rule puts all the responsibility for judging how to treat people on yourself, when you aren’t the target of that treatment in the first place. It just intuitively feels better to me to go about the problem by figuring out what that other person you’re interacting with wants, and try to honor their preferences (within reason, of course. I’m probably not going to empty my bank accounts and spend it on a mountain of fudge just because that’s how someone else wants to be treated (unless that someone else is really, really important to me.))

1 Like
but you have to understand that the opinions and perspectives this sort of Christian fundamentalism has about society and culture were formed between the late 1920s and early 1970s and, because of this, the culture wars that they are fighting often come across as confusingly antiquated

This, actually, as a general comment on this set of religious movements, something people seem to miss… it is indeed very recent and a strong reaction to modernity, like the Islamist movement which began in the 20s and 30s.

3 Likes

Can I? No. I definitely can’t. But I’d have a great time trying!

1 Like

A saying several friends use on me, " I feel ya trey". Can’t say I know what it means, but it feels appropriate. :smile:

I think it is equally important to treat yourself with the same respect you treat others. So really it honestly is a wash if you start with yourself or another person.

But game theory, as I understand it, posits you can’t know the other persons thoughts or motivations. So you must start from yourself. So a default position of the Golden Rule, statistically should have a better long term outcome.

1 Like

See, I kinda didn’t notice that you were talking specifically about Game Theory. I completely agree from that angle.

I’ve been unusually scatter brained today and can’t figure out why.

This is why I like conversations, not arguments :smile: plus I am super scatter brained too. I’ve been off coffee for two months, but may need to relapse.

2 Likes