I assume thereâs no penalty for perjury, if you represent the government?
âThat suggestion was mistaken,â wrote Justice Department lawyer Jonathan
Levy. âWe regret this inadvertent inaccuracy and apologize for any
confusion that may have been caused.â
Cory, do you really read this as an admission of lying?
Well, when the president government does it, that means itâs not illegal.
From what I read, Cory claimed they lied, not that they admitted it. Of course, in legal-speak, this is an admission.
Perjury by an attorney is a disbarrable offense.
Thatâs why it has been renamed as mis-speaking.
Bonuses, actually.
I submit that you should change the phrase âit lied.â to âthey lied.â because it is people that are doing the lying and those individuals should be held accountable for lying to a judge.
So they merely suggested what people could do with NSLâs? Are they in a position to do so? If theyâre not , then why suggest? And if they are in a position to do so, then its more than a suggestion.
Or are they claiming they did not know? No, theyâre claiming their suggestion was⌠Ah, screw it! For all intents and purposes they lied.
âWhoops - really goofed up there!â said the âMost Transparent Administration Everâ.
So not only are they issuing loathsome, Constitutional-shredding security letters in the name of âstopping teh terroriztsâ, but then they canât even ADMIT to doing it when legally required in a court of law.
Because FYTW.
An admission of wrong doing when overtly twisted and excusatory legal vomitus would suffice?
I think not.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.