Originally published at: Elizabeth Holmes continues to try and wriggle out of her conviction | Boing Boing
…
2 Likes
12 Likes
The grifter will keep throwing lawyers (and their tenuous, sleazy arguments) at this until her money runs out.
13 Likes
If only someone could develop a test that could detect utter desperation using only a single drop of blood…
16 Likes
Well, at least something good came out of all of this - a reminder of how great that album was!
3 Likes
She’s a scumbucket who didn’t get half the kicking around she deserved, but Rule 33 - that you have up to three years to seek a new trial on the discovery of new evidence - is, if anything, too tight. Is this a weak-ass argument? Yeah, and it will go nowhere, but that’s what Rule 33 is for.
4 Likes
No problem with her appealing. It’s her right. The story is about the straw-grasping arguments that only a wealthy white person gets to avail themselves of while others go right to jail, not passing Go and definitely not collecting $200.
4 Likes
The smoking centrifuge. Or something.
1 Like
Well I guess it’s more likely to succeed on its merits than invoking Rule 34
1 Like
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
