Ah, missed that. It seems illogical and overly intrusive that a work policy would be able to forbid fraternization outside of work.
Seems to be the sort of thing that could be challenged in court if say two random firefighters who have no direct work relationship (let’s say two people who work in different stations in a very large metropolitan area, but technically work for the same organization) were to meet randomly, and because of similar interests begin a relationship. With no power hierarchy or direct working relationship, it would seem to be the sort of thing that it would be difficult to justify on any work related basis.
Right because none of them ever have sex and don’t watch porn. Seriously, these faux outrage moments of hypocrisy borne from imaginary ant-sex values which this nation never had need to go. The primary business of humanity and indeed all life is to have sex. It’s what life is. Why we continue down the road of prudishness and sex shaming is beyond me.
Yes, I know, they used locations that belong to the city. But who was harmed? What damage was caused? This is outrage over nothing more than filming what we all do anyway.
