Is that a trick question?
āGive me time to think about it. Donāt rush me.ā
I think what tripped me up was that it was presented as a false dichotomy, because I donāt work at a school but thereās no surfeit of randy teens in my immediate vicinity.
Apparently yes.
On the one hand legal is legal and if they were in separate schools and the teenager was at the age of consent, then as far as I know the relationship would have been legal. On the other hand, I agree with one of the previous posters who said that a sexual relationship between a 45 year old and an 18 year old is creepy. I would add that it is likely predatory as well. Even if they had been in separate schools, I suspect they would have found a way to fire the principal andālegal or notāthat would be fine with me.
I bet the scriptwriters at Brazzerz (if we can cell them that) are taking notes.
Meh, Iāll defend it. Driving while stoned is in no way comparable to driving after drinking.
Thanks for those links.\ The second oneās conclusion contained this paragraph:
Any do a bit of checking and notice the missing word in the story. āCHARTERā, yep, you betcha, they make it sound like a public school but it is in fact a charter school part of a chain of schools. Hiring the cheap and it seems sexually motivated.
Oh I get it now, they mean you canāt work at the school AND have sex with teenagers!
Damn you, Boolean logic!
Ordinarily, the punchline to one of these Florida stories would be that they were both injured when the carās back seat meth lab blew up.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.