I read that part with the “bloodthirsty” definition, rather than “optimistic,” but I don’t know what sort of atmosphere Reuters NEXT had.
3 Likes
And they were correct about that.
5 Likes
Hm. Analyze and break the watermarking, and change it to point at one of Musk’s toadies? (Easy enough to get multiple emails to compare if they send it out to name and role accounts.)
3 Likes
5 Likes
It could be done in a cryptographically secure way. Might be easier to convince said toady to forward it themselves.
2 Likes
A song by a former admirer.
Oblig. The kids are alright
7 Likes
Uploaded two years ago, so she recognized how problematic the asshole was a lot sooner than many of her peers.
6 Likes
No one will ever figure out how to get around that!
6 Likes
Yeah! She seems real smart. I just found out about her today from an interview on Joshua Topolsky’s What Future? podcast. I could not help but compare compare it to an interview that Sean Carroll did with Grimes a couple of years ago where she sounds smart and interesting while she’s talking, but if you think about what she actually said it could have been written by GPTChat.
1 Like
Betting good money he isn’t the last Twitter employee working for SA.
6 Likes
5 Likes
Aaron Rupar too:
5 Likes
… how fast is it circling the drain 
3 Likes
8 Likes
The page hosted by the Northern District of California doesn’t show any new activity, but Cornet v. Twitter (a class action suit about WARN act violations) had a hearing on the 8th and on the 14th a judge ordered that Twitter must notify fired employees about the pending class action lawsuit. The plaintiffs have until the 19th to come up with the language that Twitter’s notice should use. The order also says that Twitter has “a pending motion to compel arbitration and strike the class allegations which will be taken up in January 2023.” There was also this.
Twitter intends to offer severance agreements to laid off employees, and its attorney stated at the hearing that it will ask for a general release as part of the package. Twitter will also ask employees to waive California Civil Code Section 1542, which would protect an employee from releasing claims that are unknown to them and that “would have materially affected [their] settlement with” Twitter.
4 Likes
“Free speech absolutism” in action!
3 Likes
A few coal mine canaries to check in on occasionally throughout the night
9 Likes
7 Likes
